Remove this ad

eyes of fire


Posts: 553


Jun 10 12 10:11 AM

Tags : :

one: i am the lawfull habitant man standing upon the habitant lands of my ancestor's here on turtle island: i am here only for the positive law that protect's my habitant people and my habitant royal family; i have appeared: i claim sinderesis; the law of logic and reason; therefore: i am not subject nor obligated to anyhing that does not protect me, my family or my people: i will not contract to my own demise; i am not subject nor obligated thereby: to any CODE, IMPOSED RULES OF FORCE; NOR LAND LOCKED FLEET OR ADMIRALTY; IMPOSD CORPORATE BOUNDARIES: NOR THE STYLES OR COLORS OF LAW; CORPORATE REGULATIONS-STATUATORY OR OTHERWISE NOR THE ASSUPTION AND PRESUMPTIONS OF CROWN EMPLOYEE'S; which are only applicable to FEDERAL, PROVINCIAL, MUNICIPAL and AGENTS OF THE CROWN TEMPLE; i do not work for or vote for the THE SUBSIDERY OF CANADA: AN INCORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WASHINGTON, LONDON NOR THE VATICAN; NOR STATES OR PROVINCE'S: NOR ITS CITY STATES; NOR ITS MASTER'S OF VATICAN, LONDON, OR WASHINGTON; al et al: as a colonial jurisdictional fraud on a gobal scale concealed: is still a fraud by the COLONIAL INHABITANTS AND AGENT'S "ACTING" OVER AND ABOVE my lawfull habitant royal family and natural habitant people of the great turtle island: "AMERICA'S" IS A HOSTILE CORPORATE TAKEOVER of my habitant royal family's americus trading post empire: to which i have every right to be protected on any territory on this land; whereas my family held three hundred treaty's in the plains here; first in line is first in time.

two: whereas i held parental consent to the safety and protection of cora's and billy's children; i was completely within my inherent right's to protect them and my own children; i did not consent to the entry of WINNIPEG POLICE; who failed to produce warrant of arrest, warrant of search and seizure of my property; nor produce the social worker to discuss this matter of the safety and protection of these children under the CHILD WELFARE ACT: which has failed to protect me and my children and then eight WINNIPEG POLICE OFFICER'S stormed my house violating my warnings that i would protect these children of cora's and billy's and my own; thus again i am within my inherent right's to defend these children from BADMAN actions of assumed and presumed jurisdiction; if i was the "SOVEREIGN TERRORIST" these WINNIPEG POLICE OFFICER'S claimed and i had a machety...then why did i defend these children with a stick? claims by the said WINNIPEG POLICE OFFICER'S of threatening to kill them three times are purely imaginary at best: for the reality is i thanked them for teaching me this lesson in sovereignty; further if it were true that i threatened to kill them three times: then logically reasoned is the matter of what were they doing to me to cause me to break my peace? check the abuction time around 9pm to the processing time at the remand center: most telling and confirming: i was not read arrest rights nor miranda rights: i was told i had no rights and that: "slaves have no rights!".

three: nor i or my twin brother received warrants for my arrest nor warrant's for search and seizure of my property: nor explaination for the abduction of my children: we gave no consent to the removal of any of these children; when my brother sean arrived on the scene: the children were gone; when sean enquired what happened he was told it would breach my "privacy rights" to disclose: thus did we not consent to these children being socially molested by removal to DISTRICT 3 to be intimidated and oppressed to give video evidence against me without parental consent. to treat realeen, avalon, lakota and bobbysue as criminals is is not only unthinkable; it is unforgivable: how does that fit in the CHILD WELFARE ACT OF CANADA? transparency is manditory by the winnipeg police for all actions not in the interest of these beneficairy children.

four: who is DERRICK CEAL sounds like SEE-EL? is his birth name. his adopted name is: ANTHONY DERRICK FRIESEN; and what did i tell him? for his offer of two hunder gang members to attack the LEGISTLATURE? i told him "sure if its real; but it will have to prove itself." which i already knew his offer was not real: i told him to bring them this offer to his gang members; "they will have to gather out here infront of my house and they will have to swear an oath of fealty to me and do no harm, they will call themselves "rangers" and obey lawfull authority and will have to conduct themselves according to the first law; he said; "i don't know if they'd go for that"; so i said "no" to his offer of armed gang members attacking the LEGISLATURE to which they had intented heavy infliction of harm; i have not seen him since....what i felt in frustration of this ongoing CORPORATE USURPATION is not how i acted: i have acted in peace with conscience and logically with reason, and none voilently, until my home was attacked without warrant; reason or logic; in accusation of my being the "ring leader of the sovereigntist's attacking the u.s. government,"? someone else unseen set this up; there are your guilty parties colluding for my downfall and captivity and unlawfull torture: i posted these peaceful actions on Ghostchild and, which the posts in support of this reasoned decision disappeared off Ghostchild so i copied and replaced them from the high king chief did not harm, but was harm by the scheme's and inducement's of other's and set up of other's unseen? who were they? make discovery.

my terms and conditions for remedy: the court is already in possession of my lawfull stitution; as are THE OFFICE'S OF THE CORPORATIONS in DELAWARE; as is the COURT OF RECORD at the HAGUE; as is the UNITED STATES MILITARY and COAST GUARD; as is the UNITED STATES CONGRESS AND SENATE; as is the R.C.M.P. and the F.B.I; as is THE UNITED NATIONS; as is LONDON and the VATICAN; and all MASONIC LODGES; and your LEGISLATURE and silence paid to my claims by all is the acceptance of my claims is consent to my lawfull claims; thereby; thus empowered me to correct these error's to transgretion's to SIN: against all my habitant relations on the great turtle island: thereby wisdom and reason shows me these WINNIPEG POLICE OFFICER'S have been induced to act like a private army; induced to hate INDIANS as the incorporated habitant's, survivor's of the RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL SYSTEM; for truly when the CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA can stand over and correct for the RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL ERA OF A HUNDRED YEARS; then truly the inhabitant's will hold some law; thereby these OFFICER'S were induced to believe they are protected by secret covent and private contracts and fealty to the CROWN TEMPLE; induced to believe they are the LAW of the land and ENFORCER'S of the will of the CHURCH and STATE OF CANADA AND ITS PROVINCE'S; so truly all they have done is mindlessly attack to one who protect's their children's interest's; which in the court of the FRANCISED QUEEN'S BENCH of the CROWN OF CANADA; can only be redeemed by compensation and reconciliation by surrender for correction of the psychological inducement performed upon THESE OFFICER'S; causing THEIR actions of harm upon myself and my family. i am not a CITIZEN OF CANADA: i do not vote for enfranchizement scheme's or sham legal process's, i do not and will not enable the captivity of my habitant people nor my habitant family; any lawfull actions against me can only be conducted at the international court level in the COURT OF RECORD AT THE HAGUE; thank you for your time and attention to this matter of correction for the attempted murder upon my habitant self and the intellectual murder of my habitant people lawfull jurisdiction. you have my lawfull stitution: now use it in a way; that protects our habitant creditor and beneficary right's over and above YOUR INHABITANT: DEBTOR AND INDENTURED SERVANT OBILGATIONS or stand in BREACH OF TRUST AS FIDUCAIRY TRUSTEE'S: failure to act our habitant interest's: remove's your interest's and office's.

most high scott phillip hayes; your silence has made it so.

Quote    Reply   
Remove this ad
Remove this ad

eyes of fire


Posts: 553

#4 [url]

Sep 24 12 7:19 AM

thanks for sharing this with me!

Lori Douglas Inquiry Unveils Masonic Underworld

July 16, 2012
An Inquiry now taking place in Winnipeg lays bare the Masonic corruption of modern society. In 2003, a Winnipeg lawyer Jack King tried to entice a Black client, Alex Chapman, to have sex with his wife, Lori Douglas, also a lawyer.

He plied Chapman with pornographic pictures of his wife on a website devoted to interracial sex, a Masonic fetish. Images show Douglas with her hands shackled to the bed frame; a topless Douglas with a dog collar and chain around her neck; and Douglas urinating on the grass.

Despite widespread knowledge of this in the legal community, Lori Douglas later became Chief Family Court Judge of the Province of Manitoba! The Masonic Establishment is trying to sweep this scandal under the carpet. Douglas is being portrayed by Masonic-controlled media and academics as the "victim" and Chapman as a troublemaker! This article was originally posted in Sept. 2010 and slightly updated. A new take will be posted after the Inquiry ends.

Winnipeg Freemason Press columnist Lyndor Reynolds opined, "there's no reason she can't continue as a judge. One has nothing to do with the other." The judge poses for obscene photos and then rules on marriages and child custody. One has nothing to do with the other?

by Henry Makow, Ph.D.

In bygone days, if a top judge appeared naked in shackles on a website devoted to Black men ravishing White women, she would have been dismissed in disgrace.

Thankfully we live in more tolerant times, tolerant of evil.

However, we're not so tolerant of people who maintain the distinction between right and wrong.

Take Alex Chapman (picture below.) In 2003, two years before Lori Douglas became a Manitoba judge, her husband Jack King, also a lawyer, tried to procure Alex for obscene sexual acts and photos with his wife.

Since Chapman, 44, in Sept. 2010, the following developments have occurred:

1. Alex Chapman has lost his job of 13 years as an IT person with insurance giant, Great West Life. He was suspended with pay in August 2010 and escorted out of the building by security. Recently he was fired. The pretext is that he kept evidence on his office computer. The real reason is that, like most corporations, Great Waste Life is Illuminati. It is owned by the Desmarais family, Rockefeller's Canadian consiglieri.

"I'm out of the job that kept me going in all this mess," Chapman told the Winnipeg Free Press. "I didn't want to pull Great-West Life into this mess, but they're somehow politically connected. I do an excellent job. I go over and beyond each day," Chapman said, citing positive performance reviews. "They just walk people out the door because somebody phoned them up and said some crap?"

Chapman plans to file a complaint about his firing to the Manitoba Human Rights Commission. Good luck! They are another Masonic front, deciding who shall have human rights.

2. Sheriff's officers have been ordered to seize Chapman's computers and files. Lori Douglas' colleague Queen's Bench Justice Joan McKelvey made the ruling following a heated, two-hour court hearing in which Chapman claimed he is the victim of a racist, corrupt justice system.

"I'm a Black guy who has dirt on top officials. Tell me, where do Black people get fair treatment in our system," Chapman said outside court.

Chapman told court he is trying to hire a lawyer to represent him but because so many have connections to the parties in the case. He said he plans to bring a motion seeking to have all Queen's Bench judges "disqualified" from hearing any further arguments about this case on the grounds of bias.


3. Allan Fineblit, CEO of the Law Society of Manitoba, confirmed the group has been aware of "at least some details" of the scandal since 2003.

(left, Judge Lori, sans shackles, ball-in- mouth)

In other words, Douglas' extracurricular activities were widely known TWO years BEFORE she became a judge in 2005. Perhaps her depraved behavior wasn't a barrier to becoming a Family Court judge, and may have been a condition. This is the way satanic elites operate. Everyone must first be compromised.

But now the local legal eagles are "wondering whether a scandal could have been avoided if the issue had been dealt with sooner -- and possibly spared Queen's Bench Associate Chief Justice Lori Douglas the embarrassment she is now facing."

Fineblit said this week they didn't pursue the matter further because they had "no complainant." He doesn't believe there has been any attempt at a "cover-up," by his organization.

4. The Law Society has slammed the CBC for its "unwarranted attack" on a respected member of the judiciary and wants the public broadcaster to publicly apologize for its "savage" reporting. Frankly. this is the first time I have seen the CBC perform admirably.

5. University of Manitoba Law Professor Karen Busby said: "Most people have sex pictures out there somewhere, then it's an impossible standard for anyone to meet to become a judge." Have you ever heard anything so ridiculous? I must be the only person cleared to become a judge!

(Left, Illuminati have put their tramp stamp on the City of Winnipeg. Logo exhibits typical Illuminati motifs, 666, horizon)

Winnipeg Freemason Press columnist Lyndor Reynolds opined, "there's no reason she can't continue as a judge. One has nothing to do with the other." The judge poses for obscene photos and then rules on marriages and child custody. One has nothing to do with the other?

Reynolds then tries to peddle the thesis that Douglas didn't know how the pictures were used.

Puh-lease. I suppose Douglas also didn't know why she had repeated lunch dates with Chapman. Reynolds continues:

"If Karen Busby's correct, and most of us have sex pictures or ill-advised letters or emails we wish we hadn't sent, there's a lesson. Some people are judging the judge because they can, because it's sport to see the powerful humbled. I hope Douglas's friends, family and colleagues are gathering around and holding her close." (or just tying her up?)

See how they're normalizing this behavior? Everybody is like this? If they have their way, they will be.

6. Deafening by virtue of their silence, we haven't heard a peep from local church leaders, our moral guardians, all bought and paid for, apparently.

7. Another complaint has been filed with the Canadian Judicial Council against Lori Douglas. A woman complained that in 2008, Douglas failed to grant her a Prevention Order against her husband, a lawyer who ran in the same perverted circles as Judge Douglas.


We never imagined that the people telling us that religion is "superstition" were actual disciples of Satan.

I always wondered why society was so false, inhuman and sad. Now I know, it's because our elites are members of a satanic cult. They are all Masons whether they know it or not. Some belong to the feminist branch; others to the liberal or socialist branch. The "conservatives" are your ordinary garden variety Masons.

The Cabalist Illuminati bankers figured out they could take down how Western civilization by empowering the most venal and mediocre Gentile elements, and corrupting them further. They gave us today's Gentile leadership. They keep just enough dupes around to maintain the illusion of propriety and democracy.

The Illuminati need to maintain this illusion for both the masses and the intelligentsia. Periodically, as here, the mask slips and the horrible reality is glimpsed. There are still enough dupes to give the Satanists heartburn. But as you can see, many prominent people are willing to excuse and normalize depravity.

Lori Douglas -- supposedly a feminist -- was degraded and humiliated in sex orgies. Her husband procured strangers to have sex with her. Now other "feminists" are defending her. That tells you all you need to know about feminism.

If Lori Douglas is allowed to keep her $225,000 job, it will confirm once again: the Age of Satan (the New World Order) has arrived.

Select comments will be posted [email protected]

Law Society Needs a Good Lawyer --Brodbeck-Winnipeg Sun

Latest! Jan. 5- Douglas Case to be Investigated

Quote    Reply   

eyes of fire


Posts: 553

#5 [url]

Sep 24 12 7:22 AM

so much for that further link above.....

winnipeg Free Press > Error

Oops! We can’t find the page you’re looking for.

Sorry about that. The possible reasons why you’ve landing at this page are:

We have a "bad" link on our site.
The page address (URL) may have been typed incorrectly.
Something’s wrong with our web server.

Your options:

Try again and re–type the url in the address bar above.
Try searching the site by using the search box located in the top–right hand corner of this page.
Browse our site using our navigation at the top of this page.
Fill out the following form if you need additional help (all fields are mandatory):

All fields are mandatory

First Name: *
Last Name: *
E–mail Address: *
Phone: *
Describe the page you were looking for (Headline, topic, etc.): *
Issue: *
Enter the words that you see: *
reCAPTCHA challenge image
Get a new challenge Get an audio challenge Help

This is to prevent our forms from being filled out automatically.


Would you support Kris Doubledee's A-OK (Act of Kindness) idea?


View Results

View Related Story

Proudly brought to you by:
The Dilawri Group

Ads by Google

Quote    Reply   

eyes of fire


Posts: 553

#6 [url]

Sep 24 12 7:26 AM

well that was a revelation, now wasn't it? see the spin? see how they protect each other? what's up with that?

rather complicated and completely contrived JURISFICTION isn't?

on one hand our people are told we have a nation to nation relationship with the queen, and yet her children do not with her? and remain unaccountable to her for what they do to us?

if we are in some kind of contractual obilgation to the queen....where is our mutual benefit? where is our gold a silver and if concentration camps as reserve's and internment camps as residential and religious school's; then simply put: WTF?

if the queen is supposed to be the principle in the treaty's, then principle of what? it is a fraud for the queen to possess that which she does not own? and if done in here name; why does she not sue for fraud to her throne? is it her throne?

if she is not of this land; how can she be the first part in the treaty as the principle? should she be the second part contractually? as the insurer of her wayward colonial children's behavior? does not a good mother stop her children from abusing other people? consuming more then is in the treaty? and giving away what it consumes; to other's at the highest bid?

our children are somehow a commodity? though our children never see a full 1 percent of this CORPORATE ACTIVITY done in their names at birth, then isn't that also a fraud? if our COLONIAL PARENT'S took THEIR DUTIES SERIOUSLY, would there be hungry children? the homeless people? and a staggering crime rate and suicide rates among our people?

our people are arrested unlawfully everyday, tried before three levels of colonial administration, CITY, PROVINCIAL, FEDERAL: why is there no one appointed by our people to pull us out of that JURISFICTION and have proper land law presentation to the facts in the matter?

which then begs the question: if it is unlawfull to obey unlawfull authority by threat, intimidation or exploitation or by fraud, then why are we in THEIR courts?

if the jesuit's, freemason's and templars set up and operate THEIR INSTITUTED LEGAL SYSTEM: over and somehow above the first law of the women; how is the queen image a venue proof? if THEY can not follow THEIR own policy, how does that obligate us?

if this is not england, france, spain or portugul, london washington and the vatican...then why are THEIR LAWS here? how is it historically THEY are not culpable for genocide? for fraud? for intellectual murder, but we are somehow? WTF?

since this is turtle island and a law land for thousands of years, what claim can be made by this masonic league of fore father's standing on the bones of our ancestor's THEY enabled in genocide of two hundred million of our ancestor's?

i am sorry, but if you can't answer these questions you stand no chance in front of her majesty's minion's of fraud and historical crimes, for if you or i: decieve to powers not possessed; betray the people the queen is supposed to protect, and then terrorize to control, we would be locked up would we?

if THEIR LAWS had any real power; THEY WOULD ARREST THEMSELVES and LEAVE, which would allow us the opportunity to rediscover what the old ones left beside the trail, and sit down with the IMMIGRANTS and form binding law's in reality?

now where is that crown of the crown land? oh yeah, i wrote this... have a great day turtle island... most high scott phillip hayes

Quote    Reply   

eyes of fire


Posts: 553

#8 [url]

Oct 21 12 1:34 PM

thank you alfred! good judgement call.

Arthur Topham: Is Canada a DeFacto Police...
Alfred Lambremont Webre III 1:28pm Oct 21
Arthur Topham: Is Canada a DeFacto Police State?
October 18, 2012
If Arthur Topham's experience is an indication, Organized Jewry need only file a complaint and their critics will be arrested, their homes searched, computers seized and their freedoms severely restricted. All this without so much as a charge, let alone a trial. If this isn't a law suit against the Bnai Brith and RCMP, I don't know what is.

The Illuminati is waging a hateful war against humanity using Organized Jewry as one of many weapons. Anyone raising a voice is harassed by duplicitous and disingenuous cries of "hate". If you are not outraged at Topham's treatment, you are already mentally imprisoned.

Arthur Topham's Radical Press Website frozen in May 2012
by Carl Morgan
In Canada, Zionist Jews, acting at the behest of the B'nai Brith International (a secret Jews-only masonic order formed in the US in the mid-1800s by Rothschild agents in the USA), had the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) arrest Arthur Topham in May, 2012. The charge that was committing a "hate" crime.

As a result of a "hate crime" complaint, laid by B'nai B'rith operatives Richard Warman and Harry Abrams , Topham was put in jail and his home invaded by the "BC Hate Crime Team." His computers and electronic files were stolen by the "Hate Crime Team" led by Det. Cst. Terry Wilson and Cst. Normandie Levas.

Topham was never formally charged. Nevertheless, Wilson arbitrarily imposed severe restrictions on Topham before releasing him from prison. He was ordered not to go on the internet or email anyone other than those few individuals who he was working with in a private business venture.

Foremost was the order not to post any more articles on the web. The reason for this? According to the police, this was to stop him from committing further offences.

In other words, he was already guilty of the alleged "crime" and so was prohibited from committing more offences!

But the real reason was to keep him quiet while the police were busy going through all of his private communications with associates from around the world. He had thousands of letters stored in his machine that the police were desperate to get a hold of and snoop into. So desperate in fact that they were willing to obtain an illegal search warrant from a Judge based upon erroneous evidence in order to justify their actions.

Eventually Topham's lawyer Doug Christie was able to have the conditions of his Undertaking altered so that now he can send emails to friends and associates but he is still not allowed to write articles and post them anywhere on the web.

To date, one hundred and fifty-five days after his arrest, he has not been charged formally with an offence. Yet the police and the state have effectively silenced him and prohibited him from publishing anything at all.

Free speech: only in Canada you say? NOT BY A LONG SHOT!


Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. Canada
V2J 6T8

To donate via PayPal please go to the following website and click on the PayPal button on the top right corner of the home page.

Reach Arthur at [email protected]
Arthur Topham: Is Canada a DeFacto Police State? -
Henry Makow's official web site. Exposing Feminism and the New World Order

Quote    Reply   

eyes of fire


Posts: 553

#10 [url]

Oct 22 12 6:50 PM

Harper Regime Furious Over Real Canadians' Visit to Iran PDF Print
Tuesday, 16 October 2012 13:40

canada-artby Hamsayeh.Net   October 16, 2012

Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, who has proven himself to be a mere servant of the global Zionism and who regularly performs mischievous acts on their behalf - contrary to Canadian national interests - is very disturbed over a visit by native Canadian leaders to Iran.

Terry Neslon, the top Chief of Canada Aboriginals - also known as First Nations - said in an interview with Iran's English language news channel Press TV on Sunday, “For us as indigenous people from the Canadian side, for us to be in Tehran, we were absolutely set upon, we were told ‘no, don’t go to Tehran’. But we were pretty clear that the dehumanization, the demonization of the Iranian people has been one of the facts of Western media and we understand that because we too have also met with the crusader.”

Based on clear historical facts, following European mass migration to North America and particularly Canada, former inhabitants who had learned to live very peacefully with their surrounding environment, became victims of regular mistreatments by the newcomers which continue up to this day.

Ottawa has so far failed to properly compensate the native Canadians for years of exploitation of native communities.

stephen-harper-native“The problem with the indigenous peoples in Canada is that they have not done the same thing as the Native Americans. Native Americans have always consistently gone outside the country to deal with their human rights issues and essentially have dealt with other countries,” Nelson  noted.

Many First Nations children became victims of sexual, physical and emotional abuses over the years under government sponsored programs that makes it hard to keep a record of. In particular, the administration of Stephen Harper is quite apt at ignoring the plight of native Canadians. Instead he seems more interested in his role as a gofer for the global banking elites than for his country's own national interests.

“We clearly, our people’s religious spiritual understanding was confronted. So I think one of the things we have to do is that our people have to continue to go. I was really, really surprised and, I guess, not so much surprised, the treatment of the Iranian people for us has been great. This is something the Western media has always said that if you go to Iran you will be treated really badly,” Terry Nelson concluded.

The UN Human Rights Commission last year strongly condemned Ottawa's track record for human rights abuses against real Canadians.

Last Updated on Wednesday, 17 October 2012 00:57

Quote    Reply   
Remove this ad

eyes of fire


Posts: 553

#11 [url]

Mar 11 13 1:26 PM

now if your wondering why i didn't blitz this thread with the criminal behavior of the CROWN, lets just say my children and thier mother are being followed and buzzed by a helicopter, sad. anyway on the bright side is this from our relations across the big waters, it should clarify what is law and what is not very clearly to the facsimile QUEEN'S BENCH, i am not your property, i am not your slave, i am not your possession and any private contracts or covens made against me break the common law of england, further: leave my family and other habitant families i am aware of: alone, others are watching.

Quote    Reply   

eyes of fire


Posts: 553

#14 [url]

Mar 26 13 5:51 PM


The Crown Temple
By Rule of Mystery Babylon

The Templars of the Crown

The governmental and judicial systems within the United States of America, at both federal and local state levels, is owned by the "Crown," which is a private foreign power. Before jumping to conclusions about the Queen of England or the Royal Families of Britain owning the U.S.A., this is a different "Crown" and is fully exposed and explained below. We are specifically referencing the established Templar Church, known for centuries by the world as the "Crown." From this point on, we will also refer to the Crown as the Crown Temple or Crown Templar, all three being synonymous.

First, a little historical background. The Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar in two parts: the Round and the Chancel. The Round Church was consecrated in 1185 and modeled after the circular Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. The Chancel was built in 1240. The Temple Church serves both the Inner and Middle Temples (see below) and is located between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment at the Thames River. Its grounds also house the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row. This Temple "Church" is outside any canonical jurisdiction. The Master of the Temple is appointed and takes his place by sealed (non-public) patent, without induction or institution.

All licensed Bar Attorneys - Attorners (see definitions below) - in the U.S. owe their allegiance and give their solemn oath in pledge to the Crown Temple, realizing this or not. This is simply due to the fact that all Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the international Bar Association located at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple, which are physically located at Chancery Lane behind Fleet Street in London. Although they vehemently deny it, all Bar Associations in the U.S., such as the American Bar Association, the Florida Bar, or California Bar Association, are franchises to the Crown.

The Inns of Court (see below, The Four Inns of Court) to the Crown Temple use the Banking and Judicial system of the City of London - a sovereign and independent territory which is not a part of Great Britain (just as Washington City, as DC was called in the 1800s, is not a part of the north American states, nor is it a state) to defraud, coerce, and manipulate the American people. These Fleet Street bankers and lawyers are committing crimes in America under the guise and color of law (see definitions for legal and lawful below). They are known collectively as the "Crown." Their lawyers are actually Templar Bar Attornies, not lawyers.

The present Queen of England is not the "Crown," as we have all been led to believe. Rather, it is the Bankers and Attornies (Attorneys) who are the actual Crown or Crown Temple. The Monarch aristocrats of England have not been ruling sovereigns since the reign of King John, circa 1215. All royal sovereignty of the old British Crown since that time has passed to the Crown Temple in Chancery.

The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government tells us it is. If this were true, we would not be dictated to by the Crown Temple through its bankers and attornies. The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private foreign power and our unlawful Federal U.S. Government is their pawnbroker. The bankers and Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the Crown at Chancery - the Crown Temple Church and its Chancel located at Chancery Lane - a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorners from the independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing fraudulent "legal" - but totally unlawful - contracts on the American people. The banks Rule the Temple Church and the Attorners carry out their Orders by controlling their victim's judiciary.

Since the first Chancel of the Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar, this is not a new ruling system by any means. The Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court was where King John was, in January 1215, when the English barons demanded that he confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta. This City of London Temple was the headquarters of the Templar Knights in Great Britain where Order and Rule were first made, which became known as Code. Remember all these terms, such as Crown, Temple, Templar, Knight, Chancel, Chancery, Court, Code, Order and Rule as we tie together their origins with the present American Temple Bar system of thievery by equity (chancery) contracts.

"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness." - Matthew 23:27

By what authority has the "Crown" usurped the natural sovereignty of the American people? Is it acceptable that the U.S. Supreme Court decides constitutional issues in the U.S.A? How can it be considered in any manner as being "constitutional" when this same Supreme Court is appointed by (not elected) and paid by the Federal U.S. Government? As you will soon see, the land called North America belongs to the Crown Temple.

The legal system (judiciary) of the U.S.A. is controlled by the Crown Temple from the independent and sovereign City of London. The private Federal Reserve System, which issues fiat U.S. Federal Reserve Notes, is financially owned and controlled by the Crown from Switzerland, the home and legal origin for the charters of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and most importantly, the Bank of International Settlements. Even Hitler respected his Crown bankers by not bombing Switzerland. The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland controls all the central banks of the G7 nations. He who controls the gold rules the world.

Definitions you never knew:

ATTORN [e-'tern] Anglo-French aturner to transfer (allegiance of a tenant to another lord), from Old French atorner to turn (to), arrange, from a- to + torner to turn: to agree to be the tenant of a new landlord or owner of the same property. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law ©1996.

ATTORN, v.i. [L. ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassals or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate.-Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

ESQUIRE, n [L. scutum, a shield; Gr. a hide, of which shields were anciently made.], a shield-bearer or armor-bearer, scutifer; an attendant on a knight. Hence in modern times, a title of dignity next in degree below a knight. In England, this title is given to the younger sons of noblemen, to officers of the king's courts and of the household, to counselors at law, justices of the peace, while in commission, sheriffs, and other gentlemen. In the United States, the title is given to public officers of all degrees, from governors down to justices and attorneys.-Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

RULE, n. [L. regula, from regere, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain or make straight.] 1. Government; sway; empire; control; supreme command or authority. 6. In monasteries, corporations or societies, a law or regulation to be observed by the society and its particular members. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary

RULE n. 1 [C] a statement about what must or should be done, (syn.) a regulation.

REGULATION n. 1 [C] a rule, statement about what can be done and what cannot. 2 [U] the general condition of controlling any part of human life. -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.

CODE n. 1 [C;U] a way of hiding the true meaning of communications from all except those people who have the keys to understand it. 2 [C] a written set of rules of behavior. 3 [C] a formal group of principles or laws. -v. coded, coding, codes to put into code, (syn.) to encode.ENCODE v. 1 to change written material into secret symbols. -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.

CURTAIN n. [OE. cortin, curtin, fr. OF. cortine, curtine, F. courtine, LL. cortina, also, small court, small inclosure surrounded by walls, from cortis court. See Court.] 4 A flag; an ensign; -- in contempt. [Obs.] Shak. Behind the curtain, in concealment; in secret. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.

COURT, n. 3. A palace; the place of residence of a king or sovereign prince. 5. Persons who compose the retinue or council of a king or emperor. 9. The tabernacle had one court; the temple, three. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

COURT n. 2 the place where a king or queen lives or meets others. -The Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.

TEMPLAR, n. [from the Temple, a house near the Thames, which originally belonged to the knights Templars. The latter took their denomination from an apartment of the palace of Baldwin II in Jerusalem, near the temple.] 1. A student of the law. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

TEMPLE, n. [L. templum.] 1. A public edifice erected in honor of some deity. Among pagans, a building erected to some pretended deity, and in which the people assembled to worship. Originally, temples were open places, as the Stonehenge in England. 4. In England, the Temples are two inns of court, thus called because anciently the dwellings of the knights Templars. They are called the Inner and the Middle Temple. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

CAPITOL, n. 1. The temple of Jupiter in Rome, and a fort or castle, on the Mons Capitolinus. In this, the Senate of Rome anciently assembled; and on the same place, is still the city hall or town-house, where the conservators of the Romans hold their meetings. The same name was given to the principal temples of the Romans in their colonies.

INN, n. [Hebrew, To dwell or to pitch a tent.] 2. In England, a college of municipal or common law professors and students; formerly, the town-house of a nobleman, bishop or other distinguished personage, in which he resided when he attended the court. Inns of court, colleges in which students of law reside and are instructed. The principal are the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. Inns of chancery, colleges in which young students formerly began their law studies. These are now occupied chiefly by attorneys, solicitors, etc.

INNER, a. [from in.] Interior; farther inward than something else, as an inner chamber; the inner court of a temple or palace. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

CROWN, n. 4. Imperial or regal power or dominion; sovereignty. There is a power behind the crown greater than the crown itself. Junius. 19. A coin stamped with the image of a crown; hence, a denomination of money; as, the English crown. -- Crown land, land belonging to the crown, that is, to the sovereign. -- Crown law, the law which governs criminal prosecutions. -- Crown lawyer, one employed by the crown, as in criminal cases. v.t. 1. To cover, decorate, or invest with a crown; hence, to invest with royal dignity and power. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.

COLONY, n. 1. A company [i.e. legal corporation] or body of people transplanted from their mother country to a remote province or country to cultivate and inhabit it, and remaining subject to the jurisdiction of the parent state; as the British colonies in America or the Indies; the Spanish colonies in South America. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

STATE, n. [L., to stand, to be fixed.] 1. Condition; the circumstances of a being or thing at any given time. These circumstances may be internal, constitutional or peculiar to the being, or they may have relation to other beings. 4. Estate; possession. [See Estate.] -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

ESTATE, n. [L. status, from sto, to stand. The roots stb, std and stg, have nearly the same signification, to set, to fix. It is probable that the L. sto is contracted from stad, as it forms steti.] 1. In a general sense, fixedness; a fixed condition; 5. Fortune; possessions; property in general. 6. The general business or interest of government; hence, a political body; a commonwealth; a republic. But in this sense, we now use State.

ESTATE, v.t. To settle as a fortune. 1. To establish. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

PATENT, a. [L. patens, from pateo, to open.] 3. Appropriated by letters patent. 4. Apparent; conspicuous. PATENT, n. A writing given by the proper authority and duly authenticated, granting a privilege to some person or persons. By patent, or letters patent, that is, open letters, the king of Great Britain grants lands, honors and franchises.

PATENT, v.t. To grant by patent. 1. To secure the exclusive right of a thing to a person

LAWFUL. In accordance with the law of the land; according to the law; permitted, sanctioned, or justified by law. "Lawful" properly implies a thing conformable to or enjoined by law; "Legal", a thing in the form or after the manner of law or binding by law. A writ or warrant issuing from any court, under color of law, is a "legal" process however defective. - A Dictionary of Law 1893.

LEGAL. Latin legalis. Pertaining to the understanding, the exposition, the administration, the science and the practice of law: as, the legal profession, legal advice; legal blanks, newspaper. Implied or imputed in law. Opposed to actual. "Legal" looks more to the letter, and "Lawful" to the spirit, of the law. "Legal" is more appropriate for conformity to positive rules of law; "Lawful" for accord with ethical principle. "Legal" imports rather that the forms of law are observed, that the proceeding is correct in method, that rules prescribed have been obeyed; "Lawful" that the right is actful in substance, that moral quality is secured. "Legal" is the antithesis of "equitable", and the equivalent of "constructive". - 2 Abbott's Law Dict. 24; A Dictionary of Law (1893).

STATUS IN QUO, STATUS QUO. [L., state in which.] The state in which anything is already. The phrase is also used retrospectively, as when, on a treaty of place, matters return to the status quo ante bellum, or are left in statu quo ante bellum, i.e., the state (or, in the state) before the war.
-1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary

The Four Inns of Court to the unholy Temple

Globally, all the legalistic scams promoted by the exclusive monopoly of the Temple Bar and their Bar Association franchises come from four Inns or Temples of Court: the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. These Inns/Temples are exclusive and private country clubs; secret societies of world power in commerce. They are well established, some having been founded in the early 1200's. The Queen and Queen Mother of England are current members of both the Inner Temple and Middle Temple. Gray's Inn specializes in Taxation legalities by Rule and Code for the Crown. Lincoln's Inn received its name from the Third Earl of Lincoln (circa 1300).

Just like all U.S. based franchise Bar Associations, none of the Four Inns of the Temple are incorporated - for a definite and purposeful reason: You can't make claim against a non-entity and a non-being. They are private societies without charters or statutes, and their so-called constitutions are based solely on custom and self-regulation. In other words, they exist as secret societies without a public "front door" unless you're a private member called to their Bar.

While the Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license to steal from Canada and Great Britain, it is the Middle Temple that has legal license to steal from America. This comes about directly via their Bar Association franchises to the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple through the Crown Temple.

From THE HISTORY OF THE INN, Later Centuries, [p.6], written by the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple, we can see a direct tie to the Bar Association franchises and its Crown signatories in America:

"Call to the Bar or keeping terms in one of the four Inns a pre-requisite to Call at King's Inns until late in the 19th century. In the 17th and 18th centuries, students came from the American colonies and from many of the West Indian islands. The Inn's records would lead one to suppose that for a time there was hardly a young gentleman in Charleston who had not studied here. Five of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence were Middle Templars, and notwithstanding it and its consequences, Americans continued to come here until the War of 1812".

All Bar Association licensed Attorneys must keep the terms of their oath to the Crown Temple in order to be accepted or "called to Bar" at any of the King's Inns. Their oath, pledge, and terms of allegiance are made to the Crown Temple.

It's a real eye opener to know that the Middle Inn of the Crown Temple has publicly acknowledged there were at least five Templar Bar Attornies, under solemn oath only to the Crown, who signed what was alleged to be an American Declaration of Independence. This simply means that both parties to the Declaration agreement were of the same origin, the Crown Temple. In case you don't understand the importance of this, there is no international agreement or treaty that will ever be honored, or will ever have lawful effect, when the same party signs as both the first and second parties. It's merely a worthless piece of paper with no lawful authority when both sides to any agreement are actually the same. In reality, the American Declaration of Independence was nothing more than an internal memo of the Crown Temple made among its private members.

By example, Alexander Hamilton was one of those numerous Crown Templars who was called to their Bar. In 1774, he entered King's College in New York City, which was funded by members of the London King's Inns, now named Columbia University. In 1777, he became a personal aide and private secretary to George Washington during the American Revolution.

In May of 1782, Hamilton began studying law in Albany, New York, and within six months had completed a three year course of studies, passed his examinations, and was admitted to the New York Bar. Of course, the New York Bar Association was/is a franchise of the Crown Temple through the Middle Inn. After a year's service in Congress during the 1782-1783 session, he settled down to legal practice in New York City as Alexander Hamilton, Esqr. In February of 1784, he wrote the charter for, and became a founding member of, the Bank of New York, the State's first bank.

He secured a place on the New York delegation to the Federal Convention of 1787 at Philadelphia. In a five hour speech on June 18th, he stated "an Executive for life will be an elective Monarch". When all his anti-Federalist New York colleagues withdrew from the Convention in protest, he alone signed the Constitution for the United States of America representing New York State, one of the legal Crown States (Colonies).

One should particularly notice that a lawful state is made up of the people, but a State is a legal entity of the Crown - a Crown Colony. This is an example of the deceptive ways the Crown Temple - Middle Templars - have taken control of America since the beginning of our settlements.

Later, as President Washington's U.S. Treasury Secretary, Hamilton alone laid the foundation of the first Federal U.S. Central Bank, secured credit loans through Crown banks in France and the Netherlands, and increased the power of the Federal Government over the hoodwinked nation-states of the Union. Hamilton had never made a secret of the fact that he admired the government and fiscal policies of Great Britain.

Americans were fooled into believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising New England were independent nation states, but they never were nor are today. They were and still are Colonies of the Crown Temple, through letters patent and charters, who have no legal authority to be independent from the Rule and Order of the Crown Temple. A legal State is a Crown Temple Colony.

Neither the American people nor the Queen of Britain own America. The Crown Temple owns America through the deception of those who have sworn their allegiance by oath to the Middle Templar Bar. The Crown Bankers and their Middle Templar Attornies Rule America through unlawful contracts, unlawful taxes, and contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but "legal", Orders, Rules and Codes of the Crown Temple Courts, our so-called "judiciary" in America. This is because the Crown Temple holds the land titles and estate deeds to all of North America.

The biggest lie is what the Crown and its agents refer to as "the rule of law". In reality, it is not about law at all, but solely about the Crown Rule of all nations. For example, just read what President Bush stated on November 13, 2001, regarding the "rule of law:"

"Our countries are embarked on a new relationship for the 21st century, founded on a commitment to the values of democracy, the free market, and the rule of law." - Joint Statement by President George W. Bush and President Vladimir V. Putin on 11/13/01, spoken from the White House, Washington D.C.

What happened in 1776?

"Whoever owns the soil, owns all the way to the heavens and to the depths of the earth." - Old Latin maxim and Roman expression.

1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for all Americans. It is the year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown States. The Declaration of Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was signed on both sides by representatives of the Crown Temple. Legally, it announced the status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name called "States" as direct possessive estates of the Crown (see the definitions above to understand the legal trickery that was done).

The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful independence from the Crown. Proof that the Colonies are still in Crown possession is the use of the word "State" to signify a "legal estate of possession." Had this been a document of and by the people, both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution would have been written using the word "states". By the use of "State," the significance of a government of estate possession was legally established. All of the North American States are Crown Templar possessions through their legal document, signed by their representation of both parties to the contract, known as the Constitution of the United States of America.

All "Constitutional Rights" in America are simply those dictated by the Crown Temple and enforced by the Middle Inn Templars (Bar Attorners) through their franchise and corporate government entity, the federal United States Government. When a "State Citizen" attempts to invoke his "constitutional", natural, or common law "rights" in Chancery (equity courts), he is told they don't apply. Why? Simply because a State citizen has no rights outside of the Rule and Codes of Crown "law". Only a state citizen has natural and common law rights by the paramount authority of God's Law.

The people who comprise the citizenry of a state are recognized only within natural and common law as is already established by God's Law. Only a State Citizen can be a party to an action within a State Court. A common state citizen cannot be recognized in that court because he doesn't legally exist in Crown Chancery Courts. In order to be recognized in their State Courts, the common man must be converted to that of a corporate or legal entity (a legal fiction).

Now you know why they create such an entity using all capital letters within Birth Certificates issued by the State. They convert the common lawful man of God into a fictional legal entity subject to Administration by State Rules, Orders and Codes (there is no "law" within any Rule or Code). Of course, Rules, Codes, etc. do not apply to the lawful common man of the Lord of lords, so the man with inherent Godly law and rights must be converted into a legal "Person" of fictional "status" (another legal term) in order for their legal - but completely unlawful - State Judiciary (Chancery Courts) to have authority over him. Chancery Courts are tribunal courts where the decisions of "justice" are decided by 3 "judges". This is a direct result of the Crown Temple having invoked their Rule and Code over all judicial courts.

"It is held to be a settled Rule, that our courts can not take notice of any title to land not derived from the State or Colonial government, and duly verified by patent." -4 Johns. Rep. 163. Jackson v. Waters, 12 Johns. Rep. 365. S.P.

The Crown Temple was granted Letters Patent (see definition above) and Charters (definition below) for all the land (Colonies) of New England by the King of England, a sworn member of the Middle Temple (as the Queen is now). Since the people were giving the patent/charter corporations and Colonial Governours such a hard time, especially concerning Crown taxation, a scheme was devised to allow the Americans to believe they were being granted "independence." Remember, the Crown Templars represented both parties to the 1776 Declaration of Independence; and, as we are about to see, the latter 1787 U.S. Constitution.

To have this "Declaration" recognized by international treaty law, and in order to establish the new legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, Middle Templar King George III agreed to the Treaty of Paris on September 3, 1783, "between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States". The Crown of Great Britain legally was, then and now, the Crown Temple. This formally gave international recognition to the corporate "United States", the new Crown Temple States (Colonies). Most important is to know who the actual signatories to the Treaty of Paris were. Take particular note to the abbreviation "Esqr." following their names (see above definition for ESQUIRE) as this legally signifies "Officers of the King's Courts", which we now know were Templar Courts or Crown Courts. This is the same Crown Templar Title given to Alexander Hamilton (see above).

The Crown was represented in signature by "David Hartley, Esqr.", a Middle Templar of the King's Court. Representing the United States (a Crown franchise) by signature was "John Adams, Esqr", "Benjamin Franklin, Esqr." and "John Jay, Esqr." The signatories for the "United States" were also Middle Templars of the King's Court through Bar Association membership. What is plainly written in history proves, once again, that the Crown Temple was representing both parties to the agreement. What a perfect and elaborate scam the people of North America had pulled on them!

It becomes even more obvious when you read Article 5, which states in part,

"to provide for the Restitution of all Estates, Rights, and Properties which have been confiscated, belonging to real British Subjects."

The Crown Colonies were granted to "persons" and corporations of the Crown Temple through Letters Patent and Charters, and the North American Colonial land was owned by the Crown.

Now, here's a real catch-all in Article 4:

"It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted."

Since the Crown and its Templars represented both the United States, as the debtors, and the Crown, as the creditors, then they became the creditor of the American people by owning all debts of the former Colonies, now called the legal Crown States. This sounds too good to be true, but these are the facts. The words SCAM and HOODWINKED can't begin to describe what had taken place.

So then, what debts were owed to the Crown Temple and their banks as of 1883? In the Contract Between the King and the Thirteen United States of North America, signed at Versailles July 16, 1782, Article I states,

"It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the Congress of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million of livres, money of France, according to the following twenty-one receipts of the above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress, given in virtue of his full powers, to wit ... "

That amount equals about $18 million dollars, plus interest, that Hamilton's U.S. Central Bank owed the Crown through Crown Bank loans in France. This was signed, on behalf of the United States, by an already familiar Middle Templar, Benjamin Franklin, Esquire.

An additional $6 million dollars (six million livres) was loaned to the United States at 5% interest by the same parties in a similar Contract signed on February 25, 1783. The Crown Bankers in the Netherlands and France were calling in their debts for payment by future generations of Americans.

The Fiscal Agents of Mystery Babylon

Since its beginnings, the Temple Church at the City of London has been a Knight Templar secret society. It was built and established by the same Temple Knights who were given their Rule and Order by the Roman Pope. It's very important to know how the British Royal Crown was placed into the hands of the Knights Templars, and how the Crown Templars became the fiscal and military agents for the Pope of the Roman Church.

This all becomes very clear through the Concession Of England To The Pope on May 15, 1213.charter was sworn in fealty by England's King John to Pope Innocent and the Roman Church. It was witnessed before the Crown Templars, as King John stated upon sealing the same,

"I myself bearing witness in the house of the Knights Templars."

Pay particular attention to the words being used that we have defined below, especially charter, fealty, demur, and concession:

We wish it to be known to all of you, through this our charter, furnished with our seal ... not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous will and by the common counsel of our barons, do offer and freely concede to God and His holy apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman church, and to our lord pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances ... we perform and swear fealty for them to him our aforesaid lord pope Innocent, and his catholic successors and the Roman church ... binding our successors and our heirs by our wife forever, in similar manner to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at that time, and to the Roman church without demur. As a sign ... we will and establish perpetual obligation and concession ... from the proper and especial revenues of our aforesaid kingdoms ... the Roman church shall receive yearly a thousand marks sterling ... saving to us and to our heirs our rights, liberties and regalia; all of which things, as they have been described above, we wish to have perpetually valid and firm; and we bind ourselves and our successors not to act counter to them. And if we or any one of our successors shall presume to attempt this, whoever he be, unless being duly warned he come to his kingdom, and this senses, be shall lose his right to the kingdom, and this charter of our obligation and concession shall always remain firm.

Most who have commented on this charter only emphasize the payments due the Pope and the Roman Church. What should be emphasized is the fact that King John broke the terms of this charter by signing the Magna Carta on June 15, 1215. Remember; the penalty for breaking the 1213 agreement was the loss of the Crown (right to the kingdom) to the Pope and his Roman Church. It says so quite plainly. To formally and lawfully take the Crown from the royal monarchs of England by an act of declaration, on August 24, 1215, Pope Innocent III annulled the Magna Carta; later in the year, he placed an Interdict (prohibition) on the entire British empire. From that time until today, the English monarchy and the entire British Crown belonged to the Pope.

The following definitions are all taken from Webster's 1828 Dictionary since the meanings have not been perverted for nearly 200 years:

FEALTY, n. [L. fidelis.] Fidelity to a lord; faithful adherence of a tenant or vassal to the superior of whom he holds his lands; loyalty. Under the feudal system of tenures, every vassal or tenant was bound to be true and faithful to his lord, and to defend him against all his enemies. This obligation was called his fidelity or fealty, and an oath of fealty was required to be taken by all tenants to their landlords. The tenant was called a liege man; the land, a liege fee; and the superior, liege lord.

FEE, n. [In English, is loan. This word, fee, inland, or an estate in trust, originated among the descendants of the northern conquerors of Italy, but it originated in the south of Europe. See Feud.] Primarily, a loan of land, an estate in trust, granted by a prince or lord, to be held by the grantee on condition of personal service, or other condition; and if the grantee or tenant failed to perform the conditions, the land reverted to the lord or donor, called the landlord, or lend-lord, the lord of the loan. A fee then is any land or tenement held of a superior on certain conditions. It is synonymous with fief and feud. In the United States, an estate in fee or fee simple is what is called in English law an allodial estate, an estate held by a person in his own right, and descendible to the heirs in general.

FEUD, n. [L. fides; Eng. loan.] A fief; a fee; a right to lands or hereditaments held in trust, or on the terms of performing certain conditions; the right which a vassal or tenant has to the lands or other immovable thing of his lord, to use the same and take the profits thereof hereditarily, rendering to his superior such duties and services as belong to military tenure, &c., the property of the soil always remaining in the lord or superior.

By swearing to the 1213 Charter in fealty, King John declared that the British-English Crown and its possessions at that time, including all future possessions, estates, trusts, charters, letters patent, and land, were forever bound to the Pope and the Roman Church, the landlord. Some five hundred years later, the New England Colonies in America became a part of the Crown as a possession and trust named the "United States."

ATTORNING, ppr. Acknowledging a new lord, or transferring homage and fealty to the purchaser of an estate.

Bar Attorneys have been attorning ever since they were founded at the Temple Church, by acknowledging that the Crown and he who holds the Crown is the new lord of the land.

CHARTER, n. 1. A written instrument, executed with usual forms, given as evidence of a grant, contract, or whatever is done between man and man. In its more usual sense, it is the instrument of a grant conferring powers, rights and privileges, either from a king or other sovereign power, or from a private person, as a charter of exemption, that no person shall be empanelled on a jury, a charter of pardon, &c. The charters under which most of the colonies in America were settled, were given by the king of England, and incorporated certain persons, with powers to hold the lands granted, to establish a government, and make laws for their own regulation. These were called charter-governments.

By agreeing to the Magna Carta, King John had broken the agreement terms of his fealty with Rome and the Pope.

The Pope and his Roman Church control the Crown Temple because his Knights established it under his Orders. He who controls the gold controls the world.

The Crown Temple Today

The workings of the Crown Temple in this day and age is moreso obvious, yet somewhat hidden. The Crown Templars have many names and many symbols to signify their private and unholy Temple. Take a close look at the (alleged) one dollar $1 private Federal Reserve System (a Crown banking franchise) Debt Note.

Notice in the base of the pyramid the Roman date MDCCLXXVI which is written in Roman numerals for the year 1776. The words ANNUIT COEPTIS NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM are Roman Latin for ANNOUNCING THE BIRTH OF THE NEW ORDER OF THE WORLD. Go back to the definitions above and pay particular attention to the words CAPITOL, CROWN and TEMPLE. 1776 signifies the birth of the New World Order under the Crown Temple. That's when their American Crown Colonies became the chartered government called the United States, thanks to the Declaration of Independence. Since that date, the United Nations (another legal Crown Temple by charter) rose up and refers to every nation as a State member.

The Wizard of Oz = the Crown Temple

This is not a mere child's story written by L. Frank Baum. What symbol does "Oz" stand for? Ounces.Gold What is the yellow brick road? Bricks or ingot bars of gold.

The character known as the Straw Man represents that fictitious ALL CAPS legal fiction - a PERSON - the Federal U.S. Government created with the same spelling as your Christian birth name. Remember what the Straw Man wanted from the Wizard of Oz? A brain! No legal fiction has a brain because they have no breath of life! What did he get in place of a brain? A Certificate. A Birth Certificate for a new legal creation. He was proud of his new legal status, plus all the other legalisms he was granted. Now he becomes the true epitome of the brainless sack of straw who was given a Certificate in place of a brain of common sense.

What about the Tin Man? Does Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) mean anything to you? The poor TIN Man just stood there mindlessly doing his work until his body literally froze up and stopped functioning. He worked himself to death because he had no heart nor soul. He's the heartless and emotionless creature robotically carrying out his daily task as if he was already dead. He's the ox pulling the plow and the mule toiling under the yoke. His masters keep him cold on the outside and heartless on the inside in order to control any emotions or heart he may get a hold of.

The pitiful Cowardly Lion was always too frightened to stand up for himself. Of course, he was a bully and a big mouth when it came to picking on those smaller than he was. They act as if they have great courage, but they really have none at all. All roar with no teeth of authority to back them up. When push came to shove, the Cowardly Lion always buckled under and whimpered when anyone of any size or stature challenged him. He wanted courage from the Grand Wizard, so he was awarded a medal of "official" recognition. Now, regardless of how much of a coward he still was, his official status made him a bully with officially recognized authority. He's just like the Attorneys who hide behind the Middle Courts of the Temple Bar.

What about the trip through the field of poppies? They weren't real people, so drugs had no effect on them. The Wizard of Oz was written at the turn of the century, so how could the author have known America was going to be drugged? The Crown has been playing the drug cartel game for centuries. Just look up the history of Hong Kong and the Opium Wars. The Crown already had valuable experience conquering all of China with drugs, so why not the rest of the world?

Who finally exposed the Wizard for what he really was? Toto, the ugly (or cute, depending on your perspective) and somewhat annoying little dog. Toto means "in total, all together; Latin in toto." Notice how Toto was not scared of the Great Wizard's theatrics, yet he was so small in size compared to the Wizard, no-one seemed to notice him. The smoke, flames and hologram images were designed to frighten people into doing as the Great Wizard of Oz commanded. Toto simply went over, looked behind the curtain - the court - (see the definition for curtain above), saw it was a scam, and started barking until others paid attention to him and came to see what all the barking was about.Just an ordinary person controlling the levers that created the illusions of the Great Wizard's power and authority. The veil hiding the corporate legal fiction and its false courts was removed. The Wizard's game was up. It's too bad that people don't realize how loud a bark from a little dog is. How about your bark? Do you just remain silent and wait to be given whatever food and recognition, if any, your legal master gives you?

Let's not forget those pesky flying monkeys. What a perfect mythical creature to symbolize the Bar Association Attorners who attack and control all the little people for the Great Crown Wizard, the powerful and grand Bankers of Oz - Gold.

What is it going to take to expose the Wizard and tear down the court veil for what they really are? Each of us needs only a brain, a heart and soul, and courage. Then, and most importantly, we all need to learn how to work together. Only "in toto," working together as one Body of the King of Kings, can we ever be free or have the freedom given under God's Law.

Mystery Babylon Revealed

There is no mystery behind the current abomination of Babylon for those who discern His Truth:

And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. . . . . -Revelation 17:5

God has reserved His judgment for the great idolatress, Rome, the chief seat of all idolatry, that rules over many nations with whom the kings have committed to the worship of her idols (see Revelation 17:1-4). The Pope and His purported Church; sitting on the Temple throne at the Vatican; ruling the nations of the earth through the Crown Temple of ungodly deities are the Rule and Order of Babylon; the Crown of godlessness and the Code of commerce.

One may call the Rule of the world today by many names: The New World Order (a Bush family favourite), the Third Way (spoken by Tony Blair and Bill Clinton), the Illuminati, Triad, Triangle, Trinity, Masonry, the United Nations, the EU, the US, or many dozens of other names. However, they all point to one origin and one beginning. We have traced this in history to the Crown Temple, the Temple Church circa 1200. Because the Pope created the Order of the Temple Knights (the Grand Wizards of deception) and established their mighty Temple Church in the sovereign City of London, it is the Pope and his Roman Capitols who control the world.

"And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication" . . . . -Revelation 17:4

This verse appears to be an accurate description of the Pope and His Bishops for the past 1,700 years. The idolatries of commerce in the world: all the gold and silver; the iron and soft metals; the money and coins and riches of the world: All of these are under the control of the Crown Temple; the Roman King and his false Church; the throne of Babylon; attended to by his Templar Knights, the Wizards of abomination and idolatry.

"The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman [mother of harlots] sitteth" - Revelation 17:9

The only mention of "seven mountains" within our present-day Bible is at Revelation 17:9, so it's no wonder this has been a mystery to the current Body of Christ. The 1611 King James (who was a Crown Templar) Bible is not the entire canon of the early church ("church" in Latin ecclesia; in Greek ekklesia). This in itself is no mystery as history records the existence and destruction of these early church writings; just as history has now proven their genuine authenticity with the appearance of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the coptic library at Nag Hagmadi in Egypt, among many other recent Greek language discoveries within the past 100 years.

The current Holy Bible quotes the Book of Enoch numerous times:

By faith Enoch was taken away so that he did not see death, "and was not found, because God had taken him"; for before he was taken he had this testimony, that he pleased God. . . . - Hebrews 11:5

Now Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about these men also, saying, "Behold, the Lord comes with ten thousands of His saints, to execute judgment on all, to convict all who are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have committed in an ungodly way, and of all the harsh things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him." . . . - Jude 1:14-15

The Book of Enoch was considered scripture by most early Christians. The earliest literature of the so-called "Church Fathers" is filled with references to this mysterious book. The second century Epistle of Barnabus makes much use of the Book of Enoch. Second and Third Century "Church Fathers," such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Origin and Clement of Alexandria, all make use of the Book of Enoch "Holy Scripture". The Ethiopic Church included the Book of Enoch to its official canon. It was widely known and read the first three centuries after Christ. However, this and many other books became discredited after the Roman Council of Laodicea. Being under ban of the Roman Papal authorities, afterwards they gradually passed out of circulation.

At about the time of the Protestant Reformation, there was a renewed interest in the Book of Enoch, which had long since been lost to the modern world. By the late 1400s, rumors began to spread that a copy of the long lost Book of Enoch might still exist. During this time, many books arose claiming to be the lost book but were later found to be forgeries.

The return of the Book of Enoch to the modern western world is credited to the famous explorer James Bruce, who in 1773 returned from six years in Abyssinia with three Ethiopic copies of the lost book. In 1821, Richard Laurence published the first English translation. The now famous R.H. Charles edition was first published by Oxford Press in 1912. In the following years, several portions of the Greek text also surfaced. Then, with the discovery of cave number four of the Dead Sea Scrolls, seven fragmentary copies of the Aramaic text were discovered.

Within the Book of Enoch is revealed one of the mysteries of Babylon concerning the seven mountains she sits upon (underlining has been added):

[CHAPTER 52] 2 There mine eyes saw all the secret things of heaven that shall be; a mountain of iron, a mountain of copper, a mountain of silver, a mountain of gold, a mountain of soft metal, and a mountain of lead.

6 These [6] mountains which thine eyes have seen: The mountain of iron, the mountain of copper, the mountain of silver, the mountain of gold, the mountain of soft metal, and the mountain of lead. All these shall be in the presence of the Elect One as wax: Before the fire, like the water which streams down from above upon those mountains, and they shall become powerless before his feet. 7 It shall come to pass in those days that none shall be saved, either by gold or by silver, and none be able to escape. 8 There shall be no iron for war, nor shall one clothe oneself with a breastplate. Bronze shall be of no service, tin shall be of no service and shall not be esteemed, and lead shall not be desired. 9 All these things shall be denied and destroyed from the surface of the earth when the Elect One shall appear before the face of the Lord of Spirits.'

[CHAPTER 24] 3 The seventh mountain was in the midst of these, and it excelled them in height, resembling the seat of a throne; and fragrant trees encircled the throne.

[CHAPTER 25] 3 And he answered saying: �This high mountain which thou hast seen, whose summit is like the throne of God, is His throne, where the Holy Great One, the Lord of Glory, the Eternal King, will sit, when He shall come down to visit the earth with goodness. 4 As for this fragrant tree, no mortal is permitted to touch it until the great judgement when He shall take vengeance on all and bring (everything) to its consummation for ever. 5 It shall then be given to the righteous and Holy. Its fruit shall be for food to the elect: It shall be transplanted to the Holy place, to the temple of the Lord, the Eternal King. 6 Then shall they rejoice with joy and be glad, and into the Holy place shall they enter; its fragrance shall be in their bones and they shall live a long life on earth, such as thy fathers lived: In their days shall no sorrow, or plague, or torment, or calamity touch them.'

The present wealth and power of all the world's gold, silver, tin, bronze, pearls, diamonds, gemstones, iron, and copper belonging the Babylon $!+*$, and held in the treasuries of her Crown Templar banks and deep stony vaults, will not be able to save them at the time of the Lord's judgment.

But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. . . . - Matthew 23:13

Where do we go from here?

Now that their false Temple has been exposed, how does this apply to the Kingdom of Heaven? To reach the end, you must know the beginning. For everything ordained of God, there is an imitation ordained of evil that looks like the genuine thing. There is the knowledge of good and the knowledge of evil. The problem is, most believe they have the knowledge of God when what they really have is knowledge of world deceptions operating as gods. The only way to discern and begin to understand the Kingdom of Heaven is to seek the Knowledge that comes only from God, not the knowledge of men who take their legal claim as earthly rulers and gods.

The false Crown Temple and its Grand Wizard Knights have led the world to believe that they are of the Lord God and hold the knowledge and keys to His Kingdom. What they hold within their Temples are the opposite. They claim to be the "Holy Church," but which holy church? The real one or the false one? Are the Pope and his Roman Church the Temple of God, or is this the unholy Temple of Babylon sitting upon the seven mountains?

They use the same words, but alter them to show the true meaning they have applied: The State is not a state; a Certificate is not a certification. The Roman Church is not the church (ekklesia). There is the Crown of the Lord; and a Crown of that which is not of the Lord. All imitations appear to be the genuine article, but they are fakes. Those who are truly seeking the genuine Kingdom of God must allow the Lord to show them the discernment between the genuine and the imitation. Without this discernment by the Holy Spirit, all will remain fooled by the illusions of false deity emanating from the unholy spirits of the Wizards

Neither shall they say, Lo here! Or, lo there! For behold, the kingdom of God is within you. - Luke 17:21

Jesus said, "If your leaders say to you, 'Look, the (Father's) kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede you. Rather, the FATHER'S kingdom is within you and it is outside you." - Gospel of Thomas 3

Don't you know that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God lives in you?
- 1 Corinthians 3:16

Jesus said, "Know what is in front of your face, and what is hidden from you will be disclosed to you. For there is nothing hidden that will not be revealed. [And there is nothing buried that will not be raised."] . . . - Gospel of Thomas 5


See Bar Association History & Who Owns the U.S.

See The Official International Knights Templar Website




Wisdom And Freedom produced by WORLD NEWSSTAND
Copyright © 2002. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.



Your use of this site is subject to
Terms and Conditions of Use
See also our
Privacy Policy
Click to subscribe to

Quote    Reply   

eyes of fire


Posts: 553

#15 [url]

Mar 28 13 4:40 AM






from TheDragonSociety Website

The following is the introduction to the book
The Bloodlines of the Dragon that is to be published shortly. It also serves as an admirable introduction to the Dragon Court itself.

As defined within the main body of the following text, the Imperial and Royal Dragon Court represented herein, legitimately recognized as the Sovereign Court of The Sovereign Dragon Nation by the relevant and appropriate Government of a European Member State, is a closed fraternity of individuals, representing those who trace their ancestry and affiliations back to the ancient Grail and Dragon families.

A Closed Fraternity

When the Imperial and Royal Dragon Court was reconstituted by King Sigismund in 1408 as the Societas Draconis, it was based upon an ancient bloodline tradition which Sigismund assumed that he had inherited from his presumed Egyptian and Scythian ancestors through the Pictish, Dragon Princess Maelasanu of Northumbria and the Ancient and Original Angevin Royal House of Vere of Anjou, the Imperial Dukes of Angiers.

This line had descended through the
Tuatha de Danaan (the Dragon Kings of Anu) on the one hand, and the Egyptian Dragon Dynasty of Sobek on the other. The latter strain included the bloodline of the Davidic House of Judah who married into the descent of the Merovingian Kings of the Franks.

Human Vanities

Emperor Sigismund (as he was styled from 1410) was a son of the House of Luxembourg - dynasts who flagrantly altered their genealogy in order to be able to claim a fraudulent descent from this Dragon Dynasty of Maelasanu and Anjou. It is from this descent - from Maelasanu or Melusine - and upon her British, later Angiers-Angevin, Dragon Court, that Sigismund claimed the right to base Societas Draconis as a bloodline continuation of this ancient, prehistoric, anti-Christian, pre-Catholic, British Elven Institution.

One of the most famous members of Sigismund’s misappropriated organization was Vlad Basarrab or Draculea, the son of Vlad Drakul.


After Draculea’s death, his son Michael wrote that his father proudly claimed a linear descent from the Priests of the Dragon Court of Queen Sobekh Nefru of Egypt, whose predecessor Amenhemet had built the Dragon Labyrinth of Fayyum - dedicated to Sobekh - which was later copied in Crete as the Labyrinth of the Minotaur.

Dynastic Deceptions

The genealogy of the House of Drakul, Dracula or Basarrab is well known and widely documented. Descending from Attila the Hun, this family was established in Central Europe by the sons of Ghengis Khan. No bloodline with which the House of Basarrab was associated or allied in marriage at that time had any affiliation with any extraction that was remotely related with the dynasties of Egypt.

It is obvious, therefore, that Draculea or Dracula must have been claiming an apostolic succession, a spiritual priestly lineage deferring to the Egyptian Dragon Court of Sobekh Nefru through Sigismund’s assumed descent from Melusine. Her ancestry actually can be traced back to the Scythian Dragon Princess Scota, Queen Sobekh Nefru and the Egyptian Cult of the Dragon.

Undoubtedly Dracula assumed erroneously that he had received this ancient mystical honour during his investiture into Sigismund’s Societas Draconis, and by virtue of Sigismund’s supposed descent from Melusine and the ancient Angevin House of Vere. In his own right, Dracula can claim no relationship to any early Angevins, nor to the later second Anjou House of Plantagenet, except via an eight link marital bridge which has no alliances that relate him by blood to Anjou.

Sigismund assumed a personal entitlement to this legacy in 1397, the date upon which he sought to reconstitute Princess Melusine’s Dragon Court - as Societas Draconis - in a manner that he deemed the most suitable to enhance his power base and establish his royal claims. Following its subsequent formal inception in 1408, the Court recruited members from a number of prominent royal and noble houses. Historians have noted that these were not particularly known for their religious orthodoxy, including the later House of Vere in England, as one authority on Sigismund’s Dragon Court has asserted.

Today, however, the Imperial and Royal Dragon Court itself exists as a closed fraternity, a collective of individuals, comprising those who, unlike Sigismund, can trace their ancestry and affiliations back to the ancient, pre-Christian Elven, Grail and Dragon families via Anjou. The Court retains the traditional three tier degree system that Sigismund borrowed and to which he appended three separate representations of the alchemical Ouroboros emblem for the distinct ranks of the Court. A fourth emblem, configured in the form of the Egyptian Ankh or Albigensian Cross, was used by the family officers of the Inner Temple.

The tripartite system was peculiar to the Scythians and Celts, whose Druids incorporated a similar structure within their orders and colleges. It later found expression within the Cathar fraternity of Languedoc and also with the Witches.


It was developed within the Hierarchical Rule of the Knights Templars with whom the Court had a strong historical connection.

Blood Relationship

The Inner Temple is presided over by the Vere Grand Masters, who are currently resident in Britain and Europe. Being essentially an organization which emphasizes the crucial links between Dragon families, the rank system within the Court takes second place to the sense of blood relationship and the natural bond of co-operation engendered by that relationship.


Service, mutual support and respect supersede those types of ambition and advancement which prevail in other bodies which might, on the face of it, resemble the Dragon Court model in some ways. Within such orders, sights are firmly set towards material gain through supporting establishments which themselves breed division and inequity.

The tenets of the Grail and Dragon traditions are implicit in defining that we should be at one with the earth, and cannot, therefore, presume dominion over it. Unlike those who wish to profit unjustifiably from dubious Merovingian descent.

This philosophy is embedded in the concept of individual gnosis, and lies at the very heart of the Draconian culture. It is evident in all aspects of life itself.


Emanating from the ancient lore of the Elven Lords and Ladies of the Forest, this ancestral legacy forms the bedrock upon which this and all legitimately related Dragon Courts were originally founded.

The Tinker Kings

It is no secret that, through a process of calculated indoctrination, our individual decisions are often prompted by fears of non-conformity or insecurity. As a result we are conditioned to purchase a variety of hyped goods and services in order to redress personal inadequacies that do not, in fact, exist. In reality, the prevalent forms of fear-based merchandising are little different from straightforward protection rackets, and yet they are sanctioned and encouraged by our governing establishments.

For centuries, western state authorities and their Churches have enjoyed continued power over a subordinate majority, by presenting a facade of sacrosanct jurisdiction which has seemed inextricably linked to some form of royalty, nobility, or government by divine sanction. By virtue of this, it is not surprising that so many people now consider royalty, nobility and western religion to be archaic components of a system of class and privilege which has no place in the modern age.

What few recognize, however, is that for centuries the perceived representation of royalty and nobility has, to a large extent, been a fraud perpetuated by a dressed up merchant class elite who have no real entitlement to their positions. This farce, with its inherent tyranny and social abuse, has been endured through the ages, while the true bloodline families have been suppressed and supplanted by traders and brokers disguised in crowns and mitres.

In practice, there is nothing noble about these tinker kings, since the word ‘noble’ relates to gnosis or wisdom. However, they have long been defined as ‘aristocrats’ (meaning ’best rulers’), and have thereby retained gratuitous stations of power and influence in a self proclaimed higher echelon of society.

These tinker kings and their emissaries have plagued the western scene for generations, leaving all to wonder how it is that our supposed guardians and ambassadors are so often an embarrassment, and are rarely representative of community requirement.

They refer to all and sundry as ‘subjects’, ‘commoners’ and ‘flocks’ using such patronizing terminology as ‘the ordinary people’ or ‘the man in the street’, as if they had some predestined right of supremacy.


In reality, the fact is that the individual establishments of these said aristocrats (be they state heads, provincial overlords or clerical governors) are frequently very questionable, and their personal roots are often more ordinary than most.

Mother Earth

Prior to these distortions, the nature of kingship was entirely different. There was no requirement for Church sanction through coronation by parvenu popes or archbishops. Kingship was founded upon the ideal that all people were adherents of the earth, and that the earth bestowed sovereignty upon its first born people, the Elven Tribes. They were represented by a Dragon Queen, and she empowered the Grail King, who could not be a king without her.

In this environment, the right to kingship emanated from the female, since Mother Earth was herself deemed to be female. The overriding function of a king and queen was to maintain a spiritually transcendent intelligence within the realm, thereby enabling the organism (the kingdom) to function and develop in symbiosis with its surrounding environment.

If a change of governmental practice is deemed necessary, then there is nothing to gain by swapping the merchant class nobles for lawyer class presidents. There is, however, much to be gained by considering the advantages of properly defined Grail kingship and the Messianic code of princely service within a socially orientated constitutional framework.

This is the most logical route towards ensuring that true democracy prevails for ’Democracy’ and is correctly defined as ’Government for the people by the people’, as opposed to the all too familiar and oppressive ’Government of the people’.

Opportunists and Orators

As a result of a general disenchantment, many now suggest that royalty and nobility should be marginalized in favor of republican style government. Some determine that such changes replace privilege with a more acceptable form of merit advantage. However, this perception is equally untenable in practice.

All that happens is that headstrong merchant class opportunists are replaced by polished lawyer class orators, thereby creating an unwarranted new elite, with the same destructive hold on society.

Government of the majority by an exclusive clique, which uses intimidating tactics to manipulate a consumer based economy, has nothing whatever to do with the time honored spirit of Grail kingship and the Dragon blood. Any shift from monarchy to republicanism is simply a matter of different packaging. In the event, we are still captive consumers enveloped within faiths of fear. Our legacy from all this is an inbred contempt for anything which does not conform to a system of venerated sale values.


This leads to the loss of our relationship with the ecosphere upon which all species truly depend.

The Grail

The practical application of the Grail Code of service and guardianship was geared to the hermetic principle, ’As above, so below’. It recognized that no sane mind would, for the sake of short-term profit, disenfranchise the body upon which it depends.

From medieval times, however, this is precisely what has happened, with the Church installing dealers and merchants as puppet kings, traders who had no knowledge of kingship, but who have spawned dynasties which, in turn, have appointed their own colleagues as hereditary puppet nobles.

The Church and its appointees (be they monarchs, bishops or pseudo nobles) have proclaimed the Messianic legacy to be heresy.


By doing this they have underwritten and promulgated tyrannical systems of elitism, separatism and environmental domination to the detriment of the many.

Out of Egypt

The Dragon Court can first be identified in Egypt under the patronage of the priest prince Ankhfn Khonsu in about 2170 BC. It was subsequently established more formally as a pharaonic institution by the twelfth dynasty Queen Sobekh Nefru (c.1785 BC).

The Court pursued the teachings of Thoth, which had prevailed from the time of Nimrod’s grandson King Raneb, a pharaoh of the second dynasty. He reigned c. 2852 BC, about three centuries before the Gizeh pyramids are considered to have been built.

In those far off times, the priests and temples were not associated with religion as were their later successors in other lands, but rather more with the duties of preserving and teaching the old wisdom. The temples incorporated al-khame workshops. It was the obligation of the priests to maintain the spiritual welfare of the pharaohs, while ensuring the purity of a continuing royal bloodline which progressed through the Dragon Queens of the matrilinear Grail succession.

Dragon sovereignty had evolved in Egypt from old Mesopotamia and its tradition was vested in Sobek, the sacred crocodile (the messeh or mus-hus). It was from the practice of kingly anointing with the fat of the messeh that the Hebrew verb ’mashiach’ (to anoint) derived, and the Dragon dynasts became known as Messiahs (anointed ones).

In 525 BC Egypt was conquered by the Persians, whose kings were subsequently ousted by Alexander the Great’s Macedonian army in 332 BC. This led to the Greek dynasty of the Ptolemies and the well-known Queen Cleopatra VII. Her liaison with the Roman general Mark Antony caused the final downfall of the pharaohs, and Egypt was subjugated by Imperial Rome shortly before the time of Jesus.


At length, as the Roman Empire collapsed, Egypt fell to Byzantine governors and then, after AD 641, to the sway of Islam.

The PenDragons

By that time, the Grail Dynasty from David and Solomon had progressed into the West, notably to the Merovingian kings of Gaul, while related branches established kingdoms in Ireland and Celtic Britain. These lines were linked through marriage to parallel Dragon strains from Ham, Japhet and Tubal Cain (which had survived as the royal houses of Scythia and Anatolia). The families had forged their own marital links with the early princesses of the Egyptian succession.

The first PenDragon (Head Dragon) of the Britannic Isle (Pen Draco Insularis). From this stock was King Cymbeline of the House of Camu, who was installed in about AD 10. The Celtic PenDragons were not father to son successors in a particular descent, but were individually elected from reigning family branches, by a Druidic council of elders, to be the overall Kings of Kings. The last PenDragon was Cadwaladr of Gwynedd, who died in AD 664. At around that time much of Britain fell to the Germanic influence of the invading Anglo Saxons and Angle land (England) was born, as distinct from Scotland and Wales.

This coincided with Byzantium’s loss of Egypt to the Caliphs and following the last Roman Emperor in AD 476, a completely new governmental structure evolved in the West. Its ultimate overlords were the Popes, and outside the preserved Celtic domains they appointed kings not by any right of heritage, but to suit the political motives of the bishops and the fast growing Roman Church. It appeared that the days of the Dragon heritage were over.


However, the true dynasts of the original Grail stock always upheld their positions and the spirit of the Dragon Court continued in influential circles throughout Europe and the Near East.

The Dragon and the Grail

As the generations passed, the ideal of dynastic kingship spread through the Mediterranean lands into the Balkans, the Black Sea regions and Europe. But, in the course of this, the crucial essence of the old wisdom was lost, and this gave rise to dynasties that were not of the true kingly race. Instead, many were unrelated warrior chiefs who gained their thrones by might of the sword.

The sacred culture of the ancients was, nevertheless, retained in the Messianic line of King David of Judah (c.1008 BC), whose significance was not in his generally portrayed descent from Abraham and the Shemite strain, but in his Pharaonic heritage.

It was through this particular Dragon inheritance that Solomon the Wise, some eight centuries after Queen Sobeknefru, was enabled to recreate the Royal Temple project in Jerusalem. This led to a Holy Land revival of the pharaonic Rosi Crucis (dew cup) movement at a time when Egypt was beset by foreign influences, first from Libya, Nubia and Kush, and then from further afield.

As a result, the traditional marriage arrangements of the pharaohs and princesses gave way to diplomatic alliances. The symbol of the Rosi Crucis had identified the Grail succession from beyond 3000 BC, and its graphic representation was a red cross within a circle.

Societas Draconis

In 1408 (when Britain was in her Plantagenet era), the Dragon Court was formally reconstituted as a sovereign body at a time of wars and general political turmoil. As we have seen, the Court’s dubious re-emergence was instigated by Sigismund von Luxembourg, King of Hungary. Having presumptuously and erroneously assumed to have inherited the bloodline legacy in 1397, he drew up a pact with twenty-three royals and nobles who swore to observe ’true and pure fraternity’ within the Societas Draconis, a style subsequently misidentified as the Ordo Draconis (Hungarian: Sarkany Rend).

Although the original Court was by no means an Order in the recognized chivalric sense, the misnomer was strategically retained for the purposes of identification.

Along with Sigismund and the twenty-three nobles, Sigismund’s second wife, Barbara Cille (daughter of the Austrian Duke Hermann of Styria), was joint sovereign. Barbara was a Vampire who was taught by Ibrahim Eleazar, the keeper of the Sacred Magic of Abramelin the Mage, and it is she who is the model for the beautiful Countess Carmilla Karnstein in Le Fanus novel of the same name.

Sigismund’s daughter Elizabeth was also a member of the Court, and the inclusion of the entire family thereby achieved the traditional overall standard of twenty six members or two magical circles of thirteen. Others prominent in the Societas Draconis were the Kings of Poland and Aragon, the Duke of Lithuania and the unrepentant heretic, the Duke of Split.

The founding document of the Court confirmed that members might wear the insignia of a Dragon incurved into a circle, with a red cross, the original emblem of the Rosi Crucis, which had identified the Grail succession from before 3000 BC. Members were required to wear black attire on Friday - the day ruled by Venus - and to all intents and purposes they were to hold property in common.

The Society had no patron saint, it had no chapel or chapter house and observed no feast or holy days. Members were expected to have been ennobled prior to entry and were only elevated within the Society in recognition of their contributions to the welfare of the Crown. Sigismund never knighted anyone into the Society. This ignored completely all the expected rituals and affectations of chivalry prevalent at the time.


At least the Luxemburgundian got that right.

Imperial Status

Shortly after this foundation, Sigismund was crowned Holy Roman Emperor and, as a result, the noble fraternity achieved a heightened status as an imperial edifice.


Although the Court’s ancient origins were steeped in pre Christian lore, Pope Eugene IV was obliged to approve his Emperor’s non Catholic establishment, for the nature of the Dragon, even if you fake it, is such that its kingly tradition surmounts the mundane constraints of denominational dispute. After all, King David, Solomon and even Jesus were all pre-Christian dynasts of the line.

There were, of course, those staunch upholders of the Church’s articles of dogma who openly opposed the pre papal concept of Grail kingship.

These bishops pronounced the Arthurian romances heretical and blacklisted the writings of Merlin in 1546 at the Council of Trento in northern Italy. Everything that was magic to the ears, and all that was fresh air to the subjugated, became denounced as sinister and occult.

The great enlightenment of the ’Grail Code’ of service was condemned in a series of brutal Inquisitions from 1203, and anything remotely connected with the female Draconian ethic was justifiably dubbed Witchcraft.

The following series of essays entitled ’The History of the Dragon Peoples’ are extracted from archival and research material. The author derives its contemporary synthesis from a 30-year period of scholarship, teaching, revelation, and ceremony. The following collection of studies reflects the nature of the author’s final conclusions in 1993.

This is the first book in a series of works covering the history of the Elven Tribes and the Dragon Tradition. Further works, due to be published here shortly, will include archaeological and historical studies of the Derkesthai Culture from 10,000 BC onwards, further material from the Dragon Archives, an ongoing series of novels and a series of scientific papers.

The ethos of the Dragon Culture encourages an intelligent, but above all a ruthlessly honest appreciation of the matters presented. We hope that this may expose the establishment’s historical fabrications and deceptions throughout history which have harmed society immeasurably.


We want to change the attitudes of the many who have been manipulated for the gain of a few for over one thousand years.




Quote    Reply   

eyes of fire


Posts: 553

#16 [url]

Mar 28 13 4:42 AM




by Joan d’Arc
from ParanoiaMagazine Website



The Dragon Legacy (formerly known as From Transylvania to Tunbridge Wells) is a new collection of essays on the "Deresthai Culture" with a hip introduction by Tracy Twyman of Dagobert’s Revenge.


This 377-page tome with numerous appendices, written by HRH Prince Nicholas de Vere, Sovereign Grand Master of the Imperial and Royal Dragon Court, purports to be an "Official History of the Dragon Peoples."

Far from being the characters of fable, de Vere explains, the Elven race, including Fairies, Dragons, Witches, Picts (Pixies) and Vampires, were very real beings whose blood rituals sustained their superconsciousness and transcendent vision, and maintained their positions as overlords of mankind.


The author claims, these gods of flesh and blood were the only gods that ever actually existed; myth transformed them into ethereal deities. Flesh and blood they were, he claims, and their bloodlines descend to the present day through the Siddhe of India and the Druids of Britain. In fact, de Vere claims to be part of this lineage.

The Scythians, a.k.a. the Danaan (d’Anu), were descendents of the Anunnaki, who, de Vere claims, were not extraterrestrials. In Scandinavia, the Danaan became the Danes or Vikings, and produced a cousin lineage, the Swedes and the Ruotsi clan that founded Russia. In Denmark the castes were called the Jarl, Carl, Thrall.


In India the castes were the Brahmins, Ksatriyas and Sudras. But the Scythian Danaan who migrated to Eire (Ireland) and the rest of Europe were a "race apart." They were a ruling caste, claims de Vere. They are the Merovingians.

The Scythians originated in the Balkans, Transylvania, Carpathia and Ukraine. In general, the Scythians ("people of the powers") were tall, pale-skinned, with golden red hair (the red heads) and green eyes. The Celtic lineage were stocky, squat with dark hair. The Royal Dragon family of the Jews - the House of David - made the Israelites an early Aryan nation.


In fact, Jesus and his mother Mary are often depicted with red hair. The Scythians and Aryan Scythian-Gaels had settlements in Israel and Judea. The Aryans were a horse culture.

The Scythian caste system consisted of three closely interknit cooperating races. From this encounter, de Vere explains, arose the eastern branch of the Aryan, Vedic "Hindu" religion, with its own Druids or magi, the Brahmins.


The Vedic religion, claims de Vere, stemmed from this contact with the Elven gods and goddesses who migrated after the flood from the Balkans and Transylvania to Sumeria. He claims, the Tantra and the Qabalah are descended from ancient Ubaid Druidic philosophy, and Sumeria is not the cradle of civilization, but is perhaps the high chair. The first Sumerians, he writes, were Ubaid Overlords from Central Eurasia.

De Vere laments that democracy has done away with the caste system. He explains that the caste system was not an arbitrary set of divisions or inequalities established through force or oppression. The system reflected the fact that people had varying capabilities, gifts and talents. Each group had its function in society.


This is the way it should have stayed, according to de Vere, but the Roman Church, containing mostly peasants, clawed its way to the top and upturned the caste system on a false document called the Donation of Constantine. Following this, a Thousand-Year Holocaust massacred the Elven Race.

Today, complains de Vere, the world is run by peasant tinkers who have put a price tag on everything. The true Overlords are now on the bottom,

"while the increasingly acquisitive Peasants and Merchants are at the top, having wrested their positions from the block-headed Warriors."

He writes:

"The end product of this fiasco over the last millennium and a half can be smelled in the air, tasted in the water supply and seen in the eyes of diseased, starving third world children. Its results can be heard in the screams of animals gratuitously tortured in experiments aimed at testing the toxicity of vanity products…"

And in the current system, our leaders have no accountability, as they would have had in dynasties past. The usurper Tinker Kings, the current Monarchy of England, asserts de Vere, are,

"false monarchies based not on service or transcendent wisdom, but on worldly greed, tyranny, trade and usury."

There is much to learn from this alternate history of the world, for instance, that the influence Vampires have had on European culture should not be underestimated.


Who knew Vampires inspired modern wheeled transport, invented large-scale tourism, and lent their images and their kilts to the lids of shortbread tins? The Vampire, de Vere explains, was a "Witch" in the distinct royal caste of Scythian-Celtic society.


Vampires were individuals and families who used the practice of drinking blood to achieve specific aims and fulfill social obligations of their rank and position. In fact the etymology of the word Vampire is "Overlord." The author warns against Poseur Vampirism. If one inflicts fear in the victim before obtaining blood, the blood will contain ingredients not worth imbibing. It must be freely given.

De Vere also discusses Tolkien’s "Middle Earth," which he claims "plots the fortunes of the Elven families" and corresponds to about the year 10,000 BC. In fact, he asserts, Tolkien’s "Third Age" could be comfortably situated pre-flood at about 22,000 BC if we disregard our simplistic caveman indoctrination. Other points of interest you’ll learn from de Vere are that the "reptilian" scales of the gods and goddesses of Sumeria were actually traditional metal armor.


The mermaids of the mere pools wore scaled armor as well. The tall tales told by David Icke regarding shapeshifting reptilians of yore are just that: tall tales. For a hint of what Prince Nicholas de Vere thinks of Icke’s wild talk, see his interview with Tracy Twyman.

Is de Vere a Satanist?


He states in his interview with Tracy Twyman,

"originally the Satans in Biblical terms were nothing more than Circuit Prosecutors within the Jewish Theocratic system. Who in their right mind would worship lawyers?"

He also asserts:

"Religions happen when people don’t get the point of the message and blindly worship the message and the messenger, instead of grasping the gnosis inherent within the words that the message conveys."

No short review could touch upon the vast subject matter contained in this book and the compelling expertise of its author, but with my max word count approaching suffice it to say: This Book is a TRIP!



Quote    Reply   

eyes of fire


Posts: 553

#17 [url]

Mar 28 13 4:45 AM

here is what the QUEEN'S BENCH is all about:

The Beast (Revelation)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
La Bête de la Mer (Tapisserie de l'Apocalypse). A medieval tapestry of the False Prophet, the Dragon, and the Beast of the Sea
Christian eschatology
Eschatology views
Christianity portal

The Beast (Greek: Θηρίον, Thērion) may refer to two beasts described in the Book of Revelation. The first beast comes from "out of the sea" and is given authority and power by the dragon. This first beast is initially mentioned in Revelation 11:7 as coming out of the abyss. His appearance is described in detail in Revelation 13:1-10 and some of the mystery behind his appearance is revealed in Revelation 17:7-18. The second beast comes from "out of the earth" and directs all peoples of the earth to worship the first beast. The second beast is described in Revelation 13:11-18 and is also referred to as the false prophet. The two beasts are aligned with the dragon in opposition to God. They persecute Christians and influence the kings of the earth to gather for the battle of Armageddon.[1] The two beasts are defeated by Christ and are thrown into the lake of fire mentioned in Revelation 19:18-20.


Book of Revelation

Beast from the sea

The description of the beast is found primarily in Revelation chapters thirteen and seventeen. Chapter thirteen gives the fullest description of the beast. John saw the beast "rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy." (Revelation 13:1) The Beast was like a leopard, with feet like the feet of a bear, and had a mouth like a lion. One of the heads of the beast had a deadly wound but the wound was healed causing people to wonder and follow the beast. (Revelation 13:1-10) This description draws many parallels with a vision in the Book of Daniel where four beasts come out of the sea in the forms of a lion, bear, leopard and a beast with ten horns.[2] In Revelation chapter seventeen we learn that the beast is scarlet in color [3] and some of the symbols are explained. The seven heads of the Beast represent both seven mountains and seven kings, and the ten horns are ten kings who have not yet received kingdoms. Of the seven kings we are told that five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come. We are also told that the beast itself is an eighth king who belongs to the seven but is going to perdition. We are also told that this beast "was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition"[4]

Beast from the earth

The second beast is primarily described in Revelation chapter thirteen. This second beast comes out of the earth whose overall appearance is not described, other than having "two horns like a lamb", and speaking "like a dragon".[5] His purpose is to promote the authority of the first beast with the ability to perform great signs, even making fire come down out of heaven. This second beast is also called the false prophet.[6] He speaks like a dragon commanding the people of the Earth to make an image "to" the beast that was wounded by a sword. It is declared that anyone who does not worship the beast or its image would be killed.[7] The lamb-horned beast from the earth also causes all people to receive the mark of the beast "in their right hand or in their forehead."[8]

Image of the Beast

The Revelation of St John: 12. The Sea Monster and the Beast with the Lamb's Horn. A woodcut by Albrecht Dürer

Those who dwell on the Earth are deceived into making an image of the beast as a means to worship his authority. It is the lamb-horned beast who breathes life into the "image of the beast", so that the image becomes alive and is able to speak. It also declares death to anyone who does not worship the authority of the beast.[9] Those who are killed for not conforming to the authority of the beast are blessed through the "first resurrection" that allows them to rule in Christ's presence as priests during the one thousand year reign. The second death has no power over these individuals who were victorious over the beast[10] by not being deceived, even though they lost their lives on Earth by his authority.[11]

Mark of the Beast

The Beast from the sea[12] also bears a name, but this name is not given anywhere in the book of Revelation. However, his name corresponds to a numerical value, that of the number 666. This number is associated with that of a man. The "mark" can be identified by either the beast's written name, or the numerical value of his name. Without this identification, one could not buy or sell.[13]

Fate of the Beast and False Prophet

The beast and the false prophet gather the kings of the earth and their armies to prepare for war against "He who sits on a white horse". The battle results in the beast being seized, along with the false prophet, where they are thrown alive into "the lake of fire". Those against the "King of Kings, and Lord of Lords" are killed and left for the fowls.[14] In the lake of fire, the beast and the false prophet are tormented day and night forever and ever.[15]The dragon joins them a little more than a millennium later after the great war.[16]



Bust of Nero at Musei Capitolini, Rome

Preterism is a Christian eschatological view that interprets prophecies of the Bible, especially the Books of Daniel and Revelation, as events which have already happened in the first century AD.

Preterist academic scholars[17][18][19] generally identify the first beast from the sea with the Roman Empire, particularly with Emperor Nero.

The beast from the earth is generally identified with the Roman Imperial cult or the Jewish religious system of the first century that conspired with the Roman state to suppress and persecute the early church.[20][21] Sometimes there is a particular identification with a personage such as a chief administrator of Roman rule in Ephesus and Asia Minor, i.e., the "henchman" of the Emperor. This is probably the provincial governor (or proconsul) who would have overseen the political and religious operations of the area from his capital in Ephesus[22] or the High Priest of the Provincial Imperial Cult, who would have been a leading citizen from one of the main cities. The imperial cult in Ephesus was set up by Domitian in 89 AD[22] (Ephesus is the location of one of the Seven Churches in Asia to whom the Book of Revelation was addressed)

Much evidence is given by preterist scholars as to why the Beast from the Sea could only have referred to Nero.

This interpretation is based upon the Angel's explanation of the beast in Revelation 17:7, that the beast's seven heads are seven kings (Rev. 17:10) and that Nero, is the sixth king "who is", who was possibly alive and the emperor reigning at the time John was writing the book.[23] The five kings who have fallen are seen as Julius, Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula and Claudius, and Galba is the one who "has not yet come, but when he does come, he must remain for a little while". (Rev. 17:10). Moreover, Rome was known in antiquity as the city of seven hills (Rev. 17:9) and Revelation was a warning about events that were "shortly" to take place (Rev. 1:1).

In Rev. 13:5-8, the Beast was given a mouth speaking in blasphemies against God and His Name. Inscriptions have been found in Ephesus in which Nero is called "Almighty God" and "Savior".[24] In verse 4, the Beast is worshiped by the world alongside the Dragon that gave it authority. Nero and Caligula "abandoned all reserve" in promoting emperor worship – they were the only two who demanded divine honors while still alive. Nero claimed to be the sun-god Apollo.

Revelation 13:7 speaks of the power given to the beast to make war with the saints. Nero was the first of the imperial authorities to persecute Christianity. Tacitus records the scene in Rome when the persecution of Christians (or Chrestians[25]) broke out: "And their death was aggravated with mockeries, insomuch that, wrapped in the hides of wild beasts, they were torn to pieces by dogs, or fastened to crosses to be set on fire, that when the darkness fell they might be burned to illuminate the night".[26]

Revelation 13:5 says the beast would continue for 42 months. The Neronic persecution was instituted in 64 AD and lasted until his death in June 68 AD, which is three and a half years, or 42 months. Nero was even called the Beast. Apollonius of Tyana specifically states that Nero was called a 'beast': "In my travels, which have been wider than ever man yet accomplished, I have seen man, many wild beasts of Arabia and India; but this beast, that is commonly called a Tyrant, I know not how many heads it has, nor if it be crooked of claw, and armed with horrible fangs. ... And of wild beasts you cannot say that they were ever known to eat their own mother, but Nero has gorged himself on this diet".[26]

The manner of Nero’s death corresponds with the prophecy of Revelation 13:10: "If anyone is destined for captivity, to captivity he goes; if any one kills with the sword, with the sword he must be killed". According to Tertullian, Nero was the first to assail the Christian sect with the imperial sword. He committed suicide by the sword at the age of 30.

After Nero's death in 68 AD, Rome saw a succession of short-lived emperors (Galba, Otho and Vitellius) and a year of civil wars until Vespasian eventually took control in 69 AD. The Roman Empire destabilized so greatly that Tacitus reported: "Many believed the end of the empire was at hand" (Histories 4:5:4) According to Suetonius, to the surprise of the world, "the empire which for a long time had been unsettled and, as it were, drifting through the usurpation and violent death of three emperors, was at last taken in and given stability by the Flavian family" (Vespasian 1: 1). This may be a reference to the mortal wound on one of the heads of the Beast "inflicted by the sword" which was later healed (Rev. 13:3, Rev. 13: 14).[27] Scholar Daniel K. Wong wrote that the "healing of the wound" alludes to the so-called Nero Redivivus Legend or the "revival of Nero” myth. A rumor that Nero had just disappeared to Parthia and would one day reappear[28]

Finally, the readers of Revelation were told to "calculate the number of the Beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six" (Rev. 13:18). John did not expect that his readers "who had understanding" to have any difficulty identifying the beast, since they could simply calculate the meaning of this number. "Neron Kaisar" (the Greek rendering, documented by archaeological finds), when transliterated into Hebrew נרון קסר (Nrwn Qsr) had a number of 666. The variant number 616 found in some manuscripts of the Greek text of Revelation may represent the alternative Hebrew spelling נרו קסר (Nrw Qsr) based on the Latin form "Nero Caesar". The variant probably existed to keep consistent the meaning of Nero as the Beast.[29]

The Greek spelling, "Nerōn Kaisar", transliterates into Hebrew as נרון קסר or "nrvn qsr". Adding the corresponding values yields 666, as shown:

Resh (ר) Samech (ס) Qof (ק) Noon (נ) Vav (ו) Resh (ר) Noon (נ) TOTAL
200 60 100 50 6 200 50 666

By contrast, the Latin title for Nero is spelled simply "Nerō Caesar", which transliterates to “נרו קסר” or "nrv qsr" and has a value of 616, which may explain that variation in some manuscripts.[30]

Resh(ר) Samech (ס) Qof (ק) Vav (ו) Resh (ר) Noon (נ) TOTAL
200 60 100 6 200 50 616


Beast wearing papal tiara from Luther's translation of the New Testament from 1522.

Historicism is a method of interpretation in Christian eschatology which attempts to associate biblical prophecies with actual historical events and identify symbolic beings with historical persons or societies in the history of the church. This interpretation was favored by the Protestant reformers[31] such as John Wycliff and Martin Luther, as well as other prominent figures such as Isaac Newton,[32] identified the Papacy as the Beast.

According to this interpretation, the beast and false prophet were most commonly identified with the papacy in its political and religious aspects.[33]

The beast from the earth has also been interpreted as the Islamic prophet Muhammed, according to some medieval Christians, particularly Pope Innocent III,[34]Saracens and Antipopes, according to other medieval Christians, particularly Joachim of Fiore[35] and the United States of America (this is the view of the Seventh-day Adventist Church).[36] This interpretation was introduced by Adventist pioneer, John Nevins Andrews.[37]

The identification with the papacy is a viewpoint echoed by Seventh-day Adventist writers. According to the Seventh-day Adventist Church, the "image to the beast" represents Protestant churches which will form an alliance with the Papacy, and the "mark of the beast" refers to a future universal Sunday law. Adventists have interpreted the number of the beast, 666, as corresponding to a Latin title Vicarius Filii Dei of the Pope. The number 666 is calculated by using a form of gematria where only the letters which refer to Latin numerals are counted.

5 1 100 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 50 1 1 500 0 1 666

In 1866, Uriah Smith was the first to propose the interpretation to the Seventh-day Adventist Church.[38] In The United States in the Light of Prophecy he wrote,

"The pope wears upon his pontifical crown in jeweled letters, this title: "Vicarius Filii Dei," "Viceregent of the Son of God;" the numerical value of which title is just six hundred and sixty-six The most plausible supposition we have ever seen on this point is that here we find the number in question. It is the number of the beast, the papacy; it is the number of his name, for he adopts it as his distinctive title; it is the number of a man, for he who bears it is the 'man of sin'."[39]

Adventist scholar J. N. Andrews also adopted this view.[40] Uriah Smith maintained his interpretation in the various editions of Thoughts on Daniel and the Revelation, which was influential in the church.[38]

Samuele Bacchiocchi, an Adventist scholar, has noted that Seventh-day Adventist teaching is moving away from historicism towards a more symbolic interpretation of the mark of the beast.[41][42]

Jimmy Akin of Catholic Answers and additional Catholic sources[43] disagree with the above argument, claiming "Vicarius Filii Dei, although it adds up to 666, is not a title of the pope".[44]

The Historical method of interpretation has fallen out of favor with modern commentaries on Revelation, partially because it has failed to form a consensus on how the outline of the book of Revelation corresponds with history.[33][45]


Idealism, also known as the allegorical or symbolic approach, is an interpretation of the book of Revelation that sees the imagery of the book as non-literal symbols.[46] This is a common viewpoint of modern Christian scholars such as Gregory Beale in his New International Greek Testament Commentary on the Book of Revelation. Some Idealist interpretations identify none of the book's symbols with particular historical events while some idealists like Beale take a more eclectic approach which see that the book portrays events throughout history while also predicting some future events such as the return of Christ.[47]

In this view, the beast from the sea is interpreted as the state or any human kingdom that is in opposition to God. This would include the Roman Empire but would broadly apply to all empires.[48] Scholars take their cue from the parallels between Revelation thirteen and Daniel seven, noting that in Daniel 7:17 that the beasts are revealed as kingdoms. Therefore given that the beast of Revelation thirteen is a composite of the beasts of Daniel, one should similarly interpret this beast as a kingdom, more specifically a composite of all kingdoms. Similarly, in some idealist circles, it is suggested that the Beast represents different social injustices, such as exploitation of workers,[49] wealth, the elite, commerce,[50] materialism, and imperialism.[51] Various Christian anarchists, such as Jacques Ellul, have associated the State and political power as the Beast.[52]

The idealist interpretation of the beast from the earth is that it represents religious, cultural and economic powers within society which work to compel people to give their allegiance to the state or governmental powers. This was first expressed in the imperial cult of Rome, but finds expression at all times of history. In his commentary, Michael Wilcock says "Religion, indeed is too narrow an identification of the second beast. He is, in modern parlance, the ideology-whether religious, philosophical, or political-which 'gives breath to' any human social structure organized independently of God.[53]

The idealist perspective on the number of the beast rejects gematria, envisioning the number not as a code to be broken, but a symbol to be understood. Because there are so many names that can come to 666 and that most systems require converting names to other languages or adding titles when convenient, it has been impossible to come to a consensus. Given that numbers are used figuratively throughout the book of revelation, idealists interpret this number figuratively as well. The common suggestion is that because seven is a number of completeness and is associated with the divine, that six is incomplete and the three sixes mean completely incomplete.[54] The number is therefore suggestive that the Dragon and his beasts are completely inadequate.


Futurism is an interpretation of the book of Revelation which sees that the symbols refer to particular persons and events in the future. This view recognizes that the book refers to itself as a prophecy[55] and that it contains references to events that are clearly future, most notably the return of Christ. This viewpoint is adopted by Dispensationalism and has become deeply rooted in American Evangelical churches.[56]

Futurism interprets the beast from the sea to represent a revived Roman empire that will oppose Christians in the last days. Futurists would admit the symbolic ties to Rome and would interpret that the recovery from the fatal head wound would refer to a revival of this empire in the last days. It is usually understood that this revived empire will be ruled by the Antichrist, though some refer to the beast as the Antichrist. Futurist scholars, such as John Walvoord, identify this beast not as the individual ruler but at the revived Roman empire, noting that the reference to Rome's seven hills and the connection to the beasts in Daniel seven indicate that the beast represents a kingdom.[57]

Futurism interprets the beast from the earth, or false prophet, as the future head of the apostate church or as a future expression of false religion in general.[58]

Interpretation of the mark or number of the beast is similar to the idealist view suggesting that the number six refers to imperfection, falling short of the divine number seven.[59] Although not reflected in futurist commentaries, a popular futurist viewpoint is that the mark of the beast will be some sort of bar code or microchip that will be used to control the future economy whereby people will be forced to give their allegiance to the beast.

A fictional representation of the futurist interpretation is the Left Behind series of 16 best-selling novels by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins. In this series the beast is portrayed as Nicolae Carpathia, who dies and is resurrected by Satan to become head of the UN, forming a worldwide government, a new worldwide religion and regional loyalty codes based on the number 666.

Alternative views

See also


  1. ^ Revelation 16:13-16
  2. ^ Daniel 7:1-7
  3. ^ Revelation 17:3
  4. ^ Revelation 17:7-18
  5. ^ Revelation 13:11
  6. ^ Revelation 19:20
  7. ^ Revelation 20:4
  8. ^ Revelation 13:11-16
  9. ^ Revelation 13:14-15
  10. ^ Revelation 15:1-4
  11. ^ Revelation 20:4-6
  12. ^ Revelation 14:9
  13. ^ Revelation 13:16-18
  14. ^ Revelation 19:11-21
  15. ^ Revelation 20:10
  16. ^ Revelation 20:2-3
  17. ^ The Book of Revelation, Catherine A. Cory
  18. ^ Revelation, Alan John Philip Garrow
  19. ^ The Message of Patmos, David Scott Clark
  20. ^ Revelation in Context By Irene Belyeu, p.154-157
  21. ^ The book of Revelation: a commentary on the Greek text By Gregory K. Beale, p.240
  22. ^ a b L. Michael White. "The AntiChrist, A Historical Puzzle". Frontline online. PBS.
  23. ^ The consensus among twentieth century scholars is that John wrote during the reign of Domitian around 95 A.D, but that some date it earlier See The Book of Revelation: A Commentary on the Greek Text – New International Greek Testament Commentary Series (1999, G K Beale Eerdmans Publishing, Grand Rapids, p.4
  24. ^ [1] A Second Look at the Second Coming, T.L. Frazier.
  25. ^ In the earliest extant manuscript containing Annales 15:44, the second Medicean, the e in "Chrestianos", Chrestians, has been changed into an i; cf. Gerd Theißen, Annette Merz, Der historische Jesus: ein Lehrbuch, 2001, p. 89. The reading Christianos, Christians, is therefor doubtful.
  26. ^ a b The Mark Of The Beast
  27. ^ Apocalypse Then Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., Th.D.
  28. ^ Wong, Daniel K. "The Beast From The Sea in Revelation 13". In Bibliotheca Sacra, vol. 160 no. 639 (Dallas, TX: Dallas Theological Seminary, July–September 2003), 337-348
  29. ^ Ancient Revelations: Papyrology Oxyrhynchus Papyri P. Oxy. LVI 4499
  30. ^ Nero as the Antichrist
  31. ^ The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers, by LeRoy Froom. Vol. 2., pg. 121.
  32. ^ The Antichrist and The Protestant Reformation
  33. ^ a b A Theology of the new Testament, by George Eldon Ladd. Revised edition,Eerdmans Publishing, pg. 672.
  34. ^ A Dictionary of biblical tradition in English literature, David L. Jeffrey, p.211
  35. ^ A Dictionary of biblical tradition in English literature, David L. Jeffrey, p.211-212
  36. ^ E.G. White, Will America Survive. Inspiration Books East, Inc.:,U.S.A (1984), p.559 ["It has been shown that the United States is the power represented by the beast with lamb-like horn"] Note: the book is originally published in 1888 under the title The Great Controversy
  37. ^ Critical issues in American religious history By Robert R. Mathisen, p.220
  38. ^ a b Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, 223. See Review and Herald 28:196, November 20, 1866.
  39. ^ Uriah Smith, The United States in the Light of Prophecy. Battle Creek, Michigan: Seventh-day Adventist Publishing Association (1884), 4th edition, p.224.
  40. ^ The Three Angels of Revelation XIV. 6-12, p.109. 1877 reprint. Cited from Adventist Bible Commentary
  41. ^
  42. ^
  43. ^ Our Sunday Visitor a Catholic newspaper (see Vicarius Filii Dei) has also denied the title
  44. ^
  45. ^ Pate, J. Daniel Hays, J. Scott Duvall, C. Marvin (2009). Dictionary of Biblical Prophecy and End Times. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan. ISBN 978-0-310-57104-9.
  46. ^ Stan Campbell and James S. Bell (2001). The Complete Idiot's Guide to the Book of Revelation. Alpha Books. pp. 212–213. ISBN 9780028642383.
  47. ^ The Book of Revelation: A Commentary on the Greek Text – New International Greek Testament Commentary Series (1999, G K Beale Eerdmans Publishing, Grand Rapids, p.48
  48. ^ Discipleship on the Edge: An Expository Journey Through the Book of Revelation, Darrell W Johnson, Regent College Publishing, 2004, p.233
  49. ^ Third Way magazine, April 1987, p.23
  50. ^ Who rides the beast?: prophetic rivalry and the rhetoric of crisis in the churches of the apocalypse, Paul Brooks Duff, p. 70, Oxford UP 2001
  51. ^ Christopher R. Smith, "Reclaiming the Social Justice Message of Revelation: Materialism, Imperialism and Divine Judgement in Revelation 18," Transformation 7 (1990): 28-33
  52. ^ a b Christoyannopoulos, Alexandre (2010). Christian Anarchism: A Political Commentary on the Gospel. Exeter: Imprint Academic. pp. 123–126. "Revelation"
  53. ^ Wilcock, Michael (1975). The Message of Revelation. Leicester England: Inter Varsity Press. p. 127.
  54. ^ The Book of Revelation: A Commentary on the Greek Text – New International Greek Testament Commentary Series (1999, G K Beale Eerdmans Publishing, Grand Rapids, pp.721-722
  55. ^ Revelation 1:3
  56. ^ A Theology of the new Testament, by George Eldon Ladd. Revised edition,Eerdmans Publishing, pg. 673.
  57. ^ The Revelation of Jesus Christ, John Walvoord, Moody Publishers (1966), ISBN 0-8024-7309-1 pp. 197-198.
  58. ^ The Revelation of Jesus Christ, John Walvoord, Moody Publishers (1966), ISBN 0-8024-7309-1 p. 205.
  59. ^ The Revelation of Jesus Christ, John Walvoord, Moody Publishers (1966), ISBN 0-8024-7309-1 p. 210
  60. ^ Carroll, Robert Todd (2003). The Skeptic's Dictionary (Aleister Crowley). Wiley. ISBN 0-471-27242-6
  61. ^ Crowley, Aleister. The Magical Diaries of Aleister Crowley (Tunisia 1923), Skinner, Stephan (editor). Samuel Weiser. ISBN 0-87728-856-9
  62. ^ Fighting for social justice: the life story of David Burgess. David S. Burgess, p.77, Wayne State UP, 2000
  63. ^ Third Way magazine, April 1987, p. 14
  64. ^ a b Servers: IT Myths: Does the 'Beast of Brussels' know everything about us?
  65. ^ a b "The Beast," a supercomputer in Belgium, is Being Used to Track Every Human Being on Earth-Fiction! Truth or Fiction
  66. ^ Albrecht, Katherine; McIntyre, Liz (2006). The Spychips Threat: Why Christians Should Resist RFID and Electronic Surveillance. Nelson Current. ISBN 1-59555-021-6.
  67. ^ Ellul, Jacques (1988). Anarchy and Christianity. Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans. pp. 71–74. ISBN 9780802804952. "The first beast comes up from the sea...It is given 'all authority and power over every tribe, every people, every tongue, and every nation' (13:7). All who dwell on earth worship it. Political power could hardly, I think, be more expressly described, for it is this power which has authority, which controls military force, and which compels adoration (i.e., absolute obedience)."
  • Wikimedia Foundation
  • Powered by MediaWiki

Quote    Reply   

eyes of fire


Posts: 553

#18 [url]

Mar 28 13 5:14 AM

this next appearance as the damaged party, not the respondent; on april 2nd 2013, should be most enlightening: so far all i have seen are all the same illusions of an authority not invested in facsimile COURT'S, it is a genocide to use force and threat to maneuver the living man or woman into a position of harm by the illusion of COMMERCIAL RIGHTS YOU do not even possess by fraud and trickery of these TREATY'S on this land: for the sake of the face commericial incompetence of your deceitful PRIVATE SOCIETY; well you didn't read the writing on the walls of this land that place me outside your JURISFICTION did you? an assumption of jurisdiction without proof is fraud in the inducement. its nearly eleven months since this crime was commited against my family and myself: and still i have heard no claims against me: i have not recieved the demanded and ordered audio and video and hospital m.r.i. or even the audio or video from the seven oaks hospital; what i have recieved is private fraud upon the CROWN who assumes he can do as he please's and he will be protected by illusion's of private contracts and such; that would be a mistake: as much as preventing this to go to public trial: i am well aware of your liability in this matter. to think it was eight months before MR. SASS appeared before me, the threats of incarceration to maneuver me into taking a lawyer by exclusion of any evidence i scott phillip hayes, would enter in the safety and protection of my family or myself? YOUR afraid, but i thank you for accepting my documented disability and i.q.; should you see me as disposible; incompetent because of my damage and limitations: how will that make you competent? i know you have coveted all evidence to protect these policemen? POLICE OFFICER'S? because criminals and demon's protect each other. to those in the QUEEN'S BENCH and the WINNIPEG POLICE FORCE and RCMP, who do believe in law, who do believe in rights, who do believe in real application of equity, i feel sorry for you because when these CORPORATESHIPS go down, you will feel as my family and my people have felt for the last four hundred years; which if there was any real law: would not result in the genocide of peacefull people: which you have have enabled in fear.        

Quote    Reply   

eyes of fire


Posts: 553

#19 [url]

Apr 12 13 11:52 PM



Thursday, March 7, 2013


A Legal Notice to all Agents of the so-called Crown of England and Elizabeth Windsor, and to all British men and women

Issued by the Governing Council of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State

This PUBLIC NOTICE is issued to the Members of the Parliament of Great Britain, the British judiciary, the governmental civil service, and the active serving members of all British police and military forces, as well as to all citizens of Britain:

1. On February 25, 2013, a lawfully constituted Common Law Court of Justice found Elizabeth Windsor, Queen of England and Head of State of Great Britain and its Church of England, guilty as charged of Crimes against Humanity in Canada and of engaging in a Criminal Conspiracy to conceal Genocide. The same verdict found Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper guilty of the same offenses.

2. This verdict was based on irrefutable evidence, including eyewitness accounts of Elizabeth Windsor's personal involvement in the forcible abduction and disappearance of ten children from the Kamloops Indian Residential School on October 10, 1964, while on a state visit to Canada. Ms. Windsor has never denied or refuted this charge or evidence, nor did she respond to a Public Summons issued by the Court.

3. The Court's verdict rests upon the Nuremberg Legal Statutes of 1950 which allow any head of state to be tried for Crimes against Humanity, as well as the right under Canadian law to hold the Crown liable for tort offenses committed in Canada.

4. Elizabeth Windsor therefore stands condemned as a convicted felon. As a fugitive from justice, she is now liable for arrest and imprisonment under the terms of the Court verdict. A Citizens Arrest Warrant for the detention of Elizabeth Windsor was in fact issued by the Court on March 5, 2013, and Ms. Windsor has evaded this Warrant.

5. a) Each of you has taken a public oath of allegiance to Elizabeth Windsor as the Queen of England. Your oath now constitutes a criminal act under international law, including Section 25 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which obligates all citizens to refrain from colluding with authorities engaged in or convicted of criminal acts.

b) Each of you is obligated therefore to refrain from aiding or abetting Elizabeth Windsor in evading justice or arrest, including by continuing to obey her orders or operating under her authority, since to do so will constitute an obstruction of justice and will make you subject to arrest.

6. Since no convicted felon can legitimately or legally serve as a head of state or a constituted authority, all existing legal and political authority in Great Britain as well as in Canada is dissolved as of Monday, February 25, 2013. Your Oath of Allegiance to Queen Elizabeth and the Crown of England is consequently nullified and abolished, along with your authority.

7. a) Great Britain has been rendered as a state without legitimate legal or political authority. It will remain so until a new and lawful Head of State can be established along with a Constitution democratically established by the people of England.

b) Until such constitutional authority is established, no existing British law or statute is enforceable, and any attempt by you or others to do so will constitute an act of illegal assault and fraud on the people of England.

8. Until a legitimate government is established in England, all of its citizens are urged to conduct themselves under the common law requirement of peaceable co-existence and equity in their communities, maintaining law and order. All citizens are required to police and govern themselves without reference to any existing authorities or laws, which are nullified, illegitimate and inoperative.

9. English citizens as wholly self-governing men and women are advised to establish local committees of correspondence to arrange a National Congress that will draft a new Constitution. This legal charter, ratified by a popular vote, will establish and maintain a new, Democratic Republic of England.

10. This Constitution must include a new legal framework by which the church organizations also convicted by the Court - the Vatican and the Roman Catholic church and the Church of England (Anglican) - can legitimately and lawfully operate in England, if such further operation is the will of the People. In accordance with the Verdict of the Court and lawful legitimacy, this new framework would require a Civil Constitution for the Clergy that nationalizes the property and wealth of the convicted church corporations, and regulates their church officials and employees as licensed public servants.

We are informing the world of these facts and of the new regime now operating in England.

Copies of the Common Law Court's Verdict and Citizens Arrest Warrant can be found at - This Notice is issued globally in consultation with the Legal Commission of the ITCCS (Brussels-London-New York)

7 March 2013



This Document can be used as a Legal Instrument by the signed Bearer to uphold his or her status as a freeborn man or woman in the territory of England who is not subject to any authority save as a Citizen of a democratically constituted Republic of England.


Signature of Citizen


Quote    Reply   

eyes of fire


Posts: 553

#20 [url]

Apr 16 13 2:24 AM

dear finger pointers:

and yes i am talking to both of THOSE on either side of this divide about CANADA; i am sure you all feel justified in your view of CANADA; so no doubt these words are waste of your incredible intellect's and need to justify harm? so let's stroll down this PAPER TRIAL of CANADA'S CLAIM: and enlighten a few along the way...


2. the CROWN TEMPLE is the dark hand behind the GOVERNMENT.

3. her majesty is a member of the CROWN TEMPLE: not the crown of ENGLAND.

4. now here's the trick; ASSIMILATION has the "original people" of turtle island: believing they are somehow: "AB-ORIGINAL, which is like saying "AB-normal" or "not original and not normal" which the fossil record proves that is simply not the case. (please see: THE BRITISH NORTH AMERICAN ACT section 2 repealed for heir's and successor's to the possession of NORTH AMERICA, CANADA, UNTIED STATES and MEXICO, FRANCHISES....1893, 1897, 1901: "IT" died with with queen victoria.)

5. original people of the great turtle island have two blood types: o-rh and a-rh, and the blacks and reds and whites all have these blood types around the world.

6. the original people in real law: are the habitant's of all original claims to land to law and people and PERSONS and commerce on their land's: that's called "competent boundaries." STATE, PROVINCE, COUNTRY are imposed CORPORATE BOUNDARIES FOR THE CONTROLL OF STOLEN COMMERCE venue's.


8. the habitant people are only subject to original law of the land of the habitant women which is enforced by the habitant men, not by GOVERNMENT: NOR: THE CROWN TEMPLE: NOR BY ANY ACT OR STATUTE OF PARLIAMENT: "CANADA" ceased in "Country" status in the bankruptcy of "1934", as "IT" handed over "IT'S" ACT'S AND STATUTE'S to the UNITED NATIONS which did not exist until "1945": leaving behind the imposed MARITIME LAWS OF ENGLAND since lost: on the way to INCORPORATION-CONFEDERATION by fraud trickery.

9. which if you check the "ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION: CANADA susceded to the "United States of America Corporation," which in turn became THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and all since the 1500's is claimed by force and fraud by queen anne; who imposed the ENFRANCHISEMENT scheme that made the habitant men into CORPORATE MALES: and habitant women and children: into CHATTLE FEMALES and KIDS. "BRITANNICA SECLORUM" check the spelling...

10. "THE CANADIAN'S": ARE ONLY THE CROWN EMPLOYEE'S. the rest of the IMMIGRANTS are deemed CORPORATE EMPLOYEE'S as PERSONS under the RULE OF LAW: under ADMIRALTY: under U.C.C.. and other such instrumentality's of fraud by the incompetent boundaries of ENGLAND exceeded.

11. law is by "land perspective"; NOT IMPOSED BY FORCE: "ALIEN SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION perception." which in reality is: "JURIS-FICTION."

12. "law": is about the good and right and true of lawfull claims in time by custom and tradition and lawfull usage within competent boundaries.



15. not one "PERSON" has ever gone to jail for the colluded murders by the CHURCH AND GOVERNMENT: of well over 50, 000 habitant children of the last 100 years....but habitant people as ABORIGINALS comprise of forty percent of all jails?

16. our habitant: brainwashed to "BELIEVE" they are ABORIGINAL'S people, suffer from the harshest treatment to break their free spirit's: which became the cycle of abuse: generationally, and identity theft is our greatest challange to over come and return to be the peace loving people of plenty.

17. CORPORATE CITIZEN'S have been conditioned to hate what they fear and to defend the stolen land under THEM proves these fact's in evidence: the CROWN TEMPLE STOLE 99% of this land and left .0001% as reserves which are internment camps. in real law: that which was stolen is returned to the original owner.


19. both sides of this CORPORATE CONTRIVANCE by IDENTITY THEFT: are victims of the same inducement's of hate, both are played off each other for affect and manipulation in the MEDIA, and BOTH are just as ignorant and hurting from being HURT, for HURTBACK.

20. FREEMAN SOVEREIGNTY: is not "freeman on the land of the women's sovereignty: by extension of right's and safety's and protection's by inclusion of the women." until that happens: FREEMAN are just another CORPORATION OF FALSE CLAIMS extending from EUROPE.

21. what is "original" about being ABORIGINAL? originals in the good heart and mind and spirit of the creator are not slaves, but the damaged parties of contractual frauds call treaties or treatise or many other fictional conceptions of POLICY for COLONIST'S put over on the habitant's by fraud claim to the right's of the king across big waters to a possession not his in time, space or reality by PAPER INSTRUMENT'S OF HARM: CONSTITUTIONS: ARE RECEIVERSHIP'S.

22. law creates no harm, POLICY IS HARM to all original claims in law.

23. in real law: the first party is the land of the resources: the second party begs contracts to enable mutual benefit for both their people's benefit by lawfull contractual agreements.

24. in real law, contracts without mutual terms and conditions for safety and protection for both part's in contract is a one sided BADMAN CONTRACT: which is DOMINION CLAIM IN FRAUD BY FORCE to remove the lawfull party of their heir's and successor's and beneficiary people of the trust. all BADMAN CONTACT'S are null and void for fraud.

25. a fraud concealed; is still fraud.

26. reality is a small frightened child tied to the MACHINE; EXTRACTING: any dream that might be radical or free.. wake up! both sides are the victims being played off the other to enable CORPORATE DARKNESS to continue sucking the marrow out of our collective bones and steal the future of every child and KID...!?

now make peace and come together and explore each others captivity: because your both slaves! to free the "one" is to free all OTHERS whose chains have fallen upon them in their sleep...only the truly evil would dare to attack these words of correction.

"in love.. in law.. in light.." from scott phillip hayes, as correction was pointed out to me by a lawfull woman shamed by the behavior of BOTH SIDES of the same problem on this facebook page: END RACE BASED LAW.

Quote    Reply   
Remove this ad
Add Reply

Quick Reply

bbcode help